Yield Adjustment Using GPR-Derived Spatial Covariance Structure in Cassava Field: A Preliminary Investigation

被引:2
作者
Agbona, Afolabi [1 ]
Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A. [2 ]
Everett, Mark E. [3 ]
Ruiz-Guzman, Henry [4 ]
Hays, Dirk B. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Mol & Environm Plant Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Colima, Fac Telematica, Colima 28040, Mexico
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geol & Geophys, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
ground-penetrating radar; cassava; heterogeneity; amplitude; variance; spatial; fresh yield; GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR; SOIL-WATER CONTENT; TREE ROOTS; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/rs15071771
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many processes concerning below-ground plant performance are not fully understood, such as spatial and temporal dynamics and their relation to environmental factors. Accounting for these spatial patterns is very important as they may be used to adjust for the estimation of cassava fresh root yield masked by field heterogeneity. The yield of cassava is an important characteristic that every breeder seeks to maintain in their germplasm. Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) has proven to be an effective tool for studying the below-ground characteristics of developing plants, but it has not yet been explored with respect to its utility in normalizing spatial heterogeneity in agricultural field experiments. In this study, the use of GPR for this purpose was evaluated in a cassava field trial conducted in Momil, Colombia. Using the signal amplitude of the GPR radargram from each field plot, we constructed a spatial plot error structure using the variance of the signal amplitude and developed GPR-based autoregressive (AR) models for fresh root yield adjustment. The comparison of the models was based on the average standard error (SE) of the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE) and through majority voting (MV) with respect to the SE of the genotype across the models. Our results show that the GPR-based AR model outperformed the other models, yielding an SE of 9.57 and an MV score of 88.33%, while the AR1 x AR1 and IID models had SEs of 10.15 and 10.56% and MV scores of 17.37 and 0.00%, respectively. Our results suggest that GPR can serve a dual purpose in non-destructive yield estimation and field spatial heterogeneity normalization in global root and tuber crop programs, presenting a great potential for adoption in many applications.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Crop Yield Prediction through Proximal Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms [J].
Abbas, Farhat ;
Afzaal, Hassan ;
Farooque, Aitazaz A. ;
Tang, Skylar .
AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2020, 10 (07)
[2]  
Agbona A., 2022, RESPONSIBLE PLANT DA, P19
[3]   Prediction of Root Biomass in Cassava Based on Ground Penetrating Radar Phenomics [J].
Agbona, Afolabi ;
Teare, Brody ;
Ruiz-Guzman, Henry ;
Dobreva, Iliyana D. ;
Everett, Mark E. ;
Adams, Tyler ;
Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A. ;
Kulakow, Peter A. ;
Hays, Dirk B. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (23)
[4]  
Annan A.P., 2002, SUBSURFACE SENSING T, V3, P253, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1020657129590
[5]  
[Anonymous], CROPPH CROP PHEN LLC
[6]   Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association [J].
Bivand, Roger S. ;
Wong, David W. S. .
TEST, 2018, 27 (03) :716-748
[7]   Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States [J].
Butnor, JR ;
Doolittle, JA ;
Kress, L ;
Cohen, S ;
Johnsen, KH .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (17) :1269-1278
[8]  
Campos JRD, 2019, ENG AGR-JABOTICABAL, V39, P358, DOI [10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v39n3p358-364/2019, 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n3p358-364/2019]
[9]  
Chiona M., 2016, GROWING CASSAVA TRAI, P1
[10]   Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity I. Survey protocols [J].
Corwin, DL ;
Lesch, SM .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2005, 46 (1-3) :103-133