International Delphi Consensus Study on disposable single-use endoscopy: A path to clinical adoption

被引:4
作者
Repici, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
Khalaf, Kareem [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Troncone, Edoardo [5 ]
Subramaniam, Sharmila [3 ]
Hassan, Cesare [1 ,2 ]
Bhandari, Pradeep [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Rozzano, Italy
[2] IRCCS, Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Rozzano, Italy
[3] Portsmouth Hosp Univ NHS Trust, Dept Gastroenterol, Portsmouth, England
[4] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Pharm & Biomed Sci, Portsmouth, England
[5] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Syst Med, Gastroenterol Unit, Rome, Italy
[6] Univ Toronto, Div Gastroenterol, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Humanitas Res Hosp & Univ, Via Manzoni 56, I-20089 Milan, Italy
关键词
Single use endoscopy; Multi drug resistant organism; Sustainability; Delphi; USE DUODENOSCOPE; BIOPSY FORCEPS; COST; TRANSMISSION; PERFORMANCE; INFECTION; SAFETY; REUSE; ERCP; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.026
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/objective: Increasing infectious rate estimates and low microbiological surveillance affect safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy globally. Single use endoscopes and accessories have been claimed to improve safety, but there is lack of data on their indication and sustainability. We aimed to identify a series of best practice recommendations for the use of single use endoscopes and accessories using a modified Delphi. Methods/design: Consensus statements for the use of single use endoscopy and accessories were developed using a modified Delphi process, utilizing an international endoscopist expert panel of 62 experts from 33 nations. The main steps in the process were selecting the consensus group, conducting systematic literature reviews, developing statements, and anonymous voting on the statements until consensus was reached. High-risk patients were defined as those with multi-drug-resistant infections, immunosuppressive medication or chemotherapy, post-transplantation, or with severe neutropenia. Results: Of the 26 statements that were voted upon through two rounds, 17 statements reached consensus. Category 1: single use accessories (8 statements), related to defining recommendations for the use of single use accessories in all patient populations or high-risk patients. Category 2: clinical indication for single use endoscopes (9 statements), including indications to high-risk patients, protecting the endoscope apparatus and contamination measures in endoscopy units. Category 3: technical factors (4 statements), related to superior performance and technical specifications with the new innovation. Category 4: environmental issues (2 statements), concerning mechanisms that reduce the detrimental burden to the environment. Category 5: financial implications (3 statements), related to healthcare policies, cost neutrality and other financial associations of single use endoscopy. Conclusions: This is the first international initiative in determining clinical indications for single use endoscopy and accessories. The study's findings should serve as a framework for future physicians to guide future research and aid the proper evidence-based indications for the implementation of single use endoscopes in clinical practice. (c) 2023 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 329
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Equivalent performance of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes in a randomised trial [J].
Bang, Ji Young ;
Hawes, Robert ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
GUT, 2021, 70 (05) :838-844
[2]   Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) - Update 2018 [J].
Beilenhoff, Ulrike ;
Biering, Holger ;
Blum, Reinhard ;
Brljak, Jadranka ;
Cimbro, Monica ;
Dumonceau, Jean-Marc ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Jung, Michael ;
Kampf, Birgit ;
Neumann, Christiane ;
Pietsch, Michael ;
Pineau, Lionel ;
Ponchon, Thierry ;
Rejchrt, Stanislav ;
Rey, Jean-Francois ;
Schmidt, Verona ;
Tillett, Jayne ;
van Hooft, Jeanin E. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 50 (12) :1205-1234
[3]  
Commissioner O of the, 2020, FDA recommends health care facilities and manufacturers begin transitioning to duodenoscopes with disposable components to reduce risk of patient infection
[4]   ASGE technology status evaluation report: disposable endoscopic accessories [J].
Croffie, J ;
Carpenter, S ;
Chuttani, R ;
DiSario, J ;
Hussain, N ;
Liu, J ;
Mishkin, D ;
Somogyi, L ;
Tierney, W ;
Petersen, BT .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (04) :477-479
[5]   Technological review: developments in innovative duodenoscopes [J].
Gromski, Mark A. ;
Sherman, Stuart .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (01) :42-50
[6]   Hygiene in endoscopy in clinic and practice 2013 in comparison with 2003-structure and process quality [J].
Jager, E. ;
Hausemann, A. ;
Hofmann, H. ;
Otto, U. ;
Heudorf, U. .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2014, 52 (12) :1402-1407
[7]  
Kim S, 2015, Off J Am Coll Gastroenterol | ACG, V110
[8]  
Kimmery M.B., 1993, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, V39, P885, DOI [10.1016/s0016-5107, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70316-8]
[9]   Transmission of Infection by Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Bronchoscopy [J].
Kovaleva, Julia ;
Peters, Frans T. M. ;
van der Mei, Henny C. ;
Degener, John E. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2013, 26 (02) :231-254
[10]   Reuse of disposable sphincterotomes for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a one-year prospective study [J].
Kozarek, RA ;
Raltz, SL ;
Ball, TJ ;
Patterson, DJ ;
Brandabur, JJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (01) :39-42