Ecological Niche Models using MaxEnt in Google Earth Engine: Evaluation, guidelines and recommendations

被引:22
作者
Campos, Joao C. [1 ,5 ]
Garcia, Nuno [1 ]
Alirio, Joao [2 ]
Arenas-Castro, Salvador [4 ]
Teodoro, Ana C. [2 ,3 ]
Sillero, Neftali [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, CICGE Ctr Invest Ciencias Geoespaciais, Alameda Monte Virgem, P-4430146 Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, Dept Geosci Environm & Land Planning, P-4169007 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Earth Sci Inst ICT, Pole FCUP, P-4169007 Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Cordoba, Fac Sci, Dept Bot Ecol & Plant Physiol, Area Ecol, Campus Rabanales, Cordoba 14014, Spain
[5] Univ Porto, Fac Sci, Ctr Invest Ciencias Geoespaciais, Alameda Monte Virgem, P-4430146 Vila Nova De Gaia, Portugal
关键词
Cloud-based platform; Correlative models; Environmental predictors; Habitat suitability models; Maximum entropy; Species distribution models; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; SAMPLING BIAS; RESOLUTION; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102147
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Google Earth Engine (GEE) has revolutionized geospatial analyses by fast-processing formerly demanding ana-lyses from multiple research areas. Recently, maximum entropy (MaxEnt), the most commonly used method in ecological niche models (ENMs), was integrated into GEE. This integration can significantly enhance modeling efficiency and encourage multidisciplinary approaches of ENMs, but an evaluation assessment of MaxEnt in GEE is lacking. Herein, we present the first MaxEnt models in GEE, as well as its first statistical and spatial evaluation. We also identify the limitations of the approach, providing guidelines and recommendations for its easier applicability in GEE.We tested MaxEnt in GEE using 11 case studies. For each case, we used species of different taxa (insects, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals) distributed across global and regional extents. Each species occupied habitats with distinct environmental characteristics (nine terrestrial and two marine species) and within diver-gent ecoregions across five continents. The models were performed in GEE and Maxent software, and both ap-proaches were contrasted for their model discrimination performance (assessed by eight evaluation metrics) and spatial consistency (correlation analyses and two measures of niche overlap/equivalency).MaxEnt in GEE allows setting several parameters, but important analyses and outputs are unavailable, such as automatic selection of background data, model replicates, and analyses of variable importance (concretely, jackknife analyses and response curves). GEE provided MaxEnt models with high discrimination performance (area under the curve mean between all species models of 0.90) and with spatial equivalency in relation to Maxent software outputs (Hellinger's I mean between all species models >0.90).Our work demonstrates the first application and assessment of MaxEnt in GEE at global and regional scales. We conclude that the GEE modeling method provides ENMs with high performance and reliable spatial pre-dictions, comparable to the widely used Maxent software. We also acknowledge important limitations that should be integrated into GEE in the future, particularly those related to the assessment of variable importance. We expect that our guidelines, recommendations and potential solutions to surpass the identified limitations could help researchers easily apply MaxEnt in GEE across different research fields.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] Species distribution models rarely predict the biology of real populations
    A. Lee-Yaw, Julie
    L. McCune, Jenny
    Pironon, Samuel
    N. Sheth, Seema
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2022, 2022 (06)
  • [2] Delimiting the geographical background in species distribution modelling
    Acevedo, Pelayo
    Jimenez-Valverde, Alberto
    Lobo, Jorge M.
    Real, Raimundo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2012, 39 (08) : 1383 - 1390
  • [3] Scientists and software - surveying the species distribution modelling community
    Ahmed, Sadia E.
    McInerny, Greg
    O'Hara, Kenton
    Harper, Richard
    Salido, Lara
    Emmott, Stephen
    Joppa, Lucas N.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2015, 21 (03) : 258 - 267
  • [4] Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent
    Anderson, Robert P.
    Gonzalez, Israel, Jr.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (15) : 2796 - 2811
  • [5] Effects of input data sources on species distribution model predictions across species with different distributional ranges
    Arenas-Castro, Salvador
    Regos, Adrian
    Martins, Ivone
    Honrado, Joao
    Alonso, Joaquim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2022, 49 (07) : 1299 - 1312
  • [6] Cross-scale monitoring of habitat suitability changes using satellite time series and ecological niche models
    Arenas-Castro, Salvador
    Sillero, Neftali
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 784
  • [7] Bio-ORACLE v2.0: Extending marine data layers for bioclimatic modelling
    Assis, Jorge
    Tyberghein, Lennert
    Bosch, Samuel
    Verbruggen, Heroen
    Serrao, Ester A.
    De Clerck, Olivier
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2018, 27 (03): : 277 - 284
  • [8] Target-group backgrounds prove effective at correcting sampling bias in Maxent models
    Barber, Robert A.
    Ball, Stuart G.
    Morris, Roger K. A.
    Gilbert, Francis
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2022, 28 (01) : 128 - 141
  • [9] Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: how, where and how many?
    Barbet-Massin, Morgane
    Jiguet, Frederic
    Albert, Cecile Helene
    Thuiller, Wilfried
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 3 (02): : 327 - 338
  • [10] Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modeling species' geographic distributions
    Beck, Jan
    Boeller, Marianne
    Erhardt, Andreas
    Schwanghart, Wolfgang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 19 : 10 - 15