Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of two capecitabine tablets in Chinese patients with breast, colorectal or gastric cancer under fed condition: A multicentric, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, two-way crossover clinical trial

被引:3
作者
Ma, Haiping [1 ]
Zhao, Naping [1 ]
Luo, Suxia [2 ]
Zhang, Yanqiao [3 ]
Yuan, Zhijun [4 ]
Sun, Hao [5 ]
Gao, Shen [1 ]
Zhan, Xianbao [6 ,8 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Clin Res Unit, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Canc Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Med Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Harbin, Peoples R China
[4] Hunan Canc Hosp, Dept Oncol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[5] Chongqing Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[6] Naval Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[7] Anhui Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Pharm, Hefei, Peoples R China
[8] Naval Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Capecitabine; Bioequivalence; Pharmacokinetics; Safety; 500; MG; BIOAVAILABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejps.2023.106373
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of two tablet formulations of capecitabine 500 mg in Chinese patients with breast, colorectal or gastric cancer under fed condition. Methods: A multicentric, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, two-way crossover trial was conducted by randomizing a single oral dose of test (T) or reference (R, Xeloda & REG;) capecitabine (500 mg) to patients of either sex with colon, colorectal or breast cancer under fed condition (high-fat and high-calorie diet). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. Patients were monitored for safety and tolerability throughout the study. Results: 74 subjects were randomly enrolled. The T/R geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-& INFIN; of capecitabine were 96.60% (85.87-108.67%), 99.07% (95.40-102.89%), 99.17% (95.29-103.21%), respectively. All 90% CIs fell within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80.00-125.00%. The common adverse events (AEs) included clinically significant laboratory abnormalities and gastrointestinal diseases. There were no serious adverse events (SAEs) or deaths during the study. No subject withdrew from the study due to AEs. Conclusion: Single oral intake of test and the reference capecitabine tablets were bioequivalent under fed condition and had similar favourable safety profiles in Chinese patients with breast, colorectal or gastric cancer. Trial registration: chinadrugtrials.org.cn (CTR20182110).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, GUID INV BIOEQ
  • [2] BIO-INTERNATIONAL-92, CONFERENCE ON BIOAVAILABILITY, BIOEQUIVALENCE, AND PHARMACOKINETIC STUDIES
    BLUME, HH
    MIDHA, KK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 82 (11) : 1186 - 1189
  • [3] Bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of capecitabine and exploration of age, gender, body surface area, and creatinine clearance as factors influencing systemic exposure in cancer patients
    Cassidy, J
    Twelves, C
    Cameron, D
    Steward, W
    O'Byrne, K
    Jodrell, D
    Banken, L
    Goggin, T
    Jones, D
    Roos, B
    Bush, E
    Weidekamm, E
    Reigner, B
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 44 (06) : 453 - 460
  • [4] Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of two capecitabine tablet formulations in patients with colon, colorectal or breast cancer
    Chachad, Siddharth
    Purandare, Shrinivas
    Malhotra, Geena
    Naidu, Raghu
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 71 (02) : 287 - 292
  • [5] Cope J.U., 2016, PRESENTATION XELODA
  • [6] Plasma disposition of capecitabine and its metabolites 5'DFCR and 5'DFUR in a standard and dose-intensified monotherapy regimen
    Czejka, Martin
    Schueller, J.
    Farkouh, A.
    Gruenberger, B.
    Scheithauer, W.
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 67 (03) : 613 - 619
  • [7] Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: sensitivity analyses in randomized controlled trials
    de Souza, Russell J.
    Eisen, Rebecca B.
    Perera, Stefan
    Bantoto, Bianca
    Bawor, Monica
    Dennis, Brittany B.
    Samaan, Zainab
    Thabane, Lehana
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2016, 103 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [8] EMA, 2015, CAP FILM COAT TABL 1
  • [9] Recent Advances in Designing 5-Fluorouracil Delivery Systems: A Stepping Stone in the Safe Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
    Entezar-Almahdi, Elaheh
    Mohammadi-Samani, Soliman
    Tayebi, Lobat
    Farjadian, Fatemeh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE, 2020, 15 : 5445 - 5458
  • [10] FDA, 2014, Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies Submitted in NDAs or INDsGeneral Considerations