Is the public ready for a tobacco-free Ireland? A national survey of public knowledge and attitudes to tobacco endgame in Ireland

被引:5
作者
Cosgrave, Ellen Juliet [1 ]
Blake, Martina [1 ]
Murphy, Edward [1 ]
Sheridan, Aishling [1 ]
Doyle, Frank [2 ]
Kavanagh, Paul [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Serv Execut, HSE Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, Dublin, Ireland
[2] RCSI Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Populat Hlth, Dept Hlth Psychol, Dublin, Ireland
[3] RCSI Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Populat Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth & Epidemiol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
End game; Prevention; Public opinion; Public policy; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1136/tc-2023-057958
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
AimIreland will not meet the tobacco endgame goal set in its 2013 Tobacco-Free Ireland (TFI) policy of reducing smoking prevalence to less than 5% by 2025. Public opinion on tobacco endgame, a key lever to realise this goal, is uncharted in Ireland. This study aimed to measure public knowledge and attitudes to tobacco endgame. MethodsA telephone-administered cross-sectional survey of 1000 randomly dialled members of the general public was conducted in 2022. Prevalence of awareness, perceived achievability and support for the TFI goal and tobacco endgame measures was calculated and compared across tobacco product use status. Logistic regression identified factors independently associated with goal support. FindingsAlthough TFI goal awareness was low (34.0%), support was high (74.6%), although most (60.2%) believed it achievable beyond 2025. Product-focused measures were popular while support for supply-focused measures was mixed: for example, 86.1% supported nicotine content reduction while 40.3% supported user licencing. Phasing out tobacco sales was highly supported (82.8%); for most, this was contingent on support for currently addicted users. TFI goal support was independently associated with female sex (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.47, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.07), higher education (aOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.66) and non-tobacco product use (aOR 2.67, 95% CI 1.66 to 4.30). ConclusionsDespite low awareness, tobacco endgame support is strong in Ireland. Public appetite for radically reducing tobacco product appeal and availability combined with public views on endgame achievability subject to extended timelines should be used to re-invigorate tobacco endgame discussion and planning in countries at risk of failing to meet declared targets.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 812
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Anderson W., 2022, 15 SMOKEFREE YEARS P
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, THE OVERTON WINDOW
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1991, Irish Times
  • [4] German Public Support for Tobacco Control Policy Measures: Results from the German Study on Tobacco Use (DEBRA), a Representative National Survey
    Boeckmann, Melanie
    Kotz, Daniel
    Shahab, Lion
    Brown, Jamie
    Kastaun, Sabrina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (04)
  • [5] Chung-Hall Janet, 2018, CMAJ Open, V6, pE412, DOI 10.9778/cmajo.20180025
  • [6] Department of Health in Ireland, 2022, HLTH IR SURV REP 202
  • [7] Support for New Zealand's Smokefree 2025 goal and key measures to achieve it: findings from the ITC New Zealand Survey
    Edwards, Richard
    Johnson, Ellie
    Stanley, James
    Waa, Andrew
    Ouimet, Janine
    Fong, Geoffrey T.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 45 (06) : 554 - 561
  • [8] Support for a tobacco endgame and increased regulation of the tobacco industry among New Zealand smokers: results from a National Survey
    Edwards, Richard
    Wilson, Nick
    Peace, Jo
    Weerasekera, Deepa
    Thomson, George W.
    Gifford, Heather
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2013, 22 (E1) : e86 - e93
  • [9] European Commission, 2019, EU RESTR CERT SINGL
  • [10] Reductions in tobacco smoke pollution and increases in support for smoke-free public places following the implementation of comprehensive smoke-free workplace legislation in the Republic of Ireland: findings from the ITC Ireland/UK Survey
    Fong, G. T.
    Hyland, A.
    Borland, R.
    Hammond, D.
    Hastings, G.
    McNeill, A.
    Anderson, S.
    Cummings, K. M.
    Allwright, S.
    Mulcahy, M.
    Howell, F.
    Clancy, L.
    Thompson, M. E.
    Connolly, G.
    Driezen, P.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2006, 15 : 51 - 58