Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions to improve mental health in deprived populations: a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Tanner, Louise M. [6 ]
Wildman, Josephine M.
Stoniute, Akvile
Still, Madeleine
Bernard, Kate [1 ]
Green, Rhiannon [2 ,5 ]
Eastaugh, Claire H. [1 ,2 ]
Thomson, Katie H.
Sowden, Sarah [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Natl Inst Hlth & Care Res NIHR Innovat Observ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, NIHR Appl Res Collaborat North East & North Cumbri, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[4] NIHR Appl Res Collaborat North East & North Cumbri, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, NIHR Innovat Observ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[6] Newcastle Univ, Evidence Synth Grp, Catalyst, 3 Sci Sq, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5TG, England
关键词
healthcare disparities; health inequalities; systematic review; mental disorders; primary health care; socioeconomic factors; SERVICES;
D O I
10.3399/BJGP.2022.0343
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Common mental health disorders are especially prevalent among people from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions, such as social prescribing and collaborative care, provide alternatives to pharmaceutical treatments for common mental health disorders, but little is known about the impact of these interventions for patients who are socioeconomically disadvantaged.Aim To synthesise evidence for the effects of non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions on common mental health disorders and associated socioeconomic inequalities. Design and setting Systematic review of quantitative primary studies published in English and undertaken in high-income countries.Method Six bibliographic databases were searched and additional grey literature sources screened. Data were extracted onto a standardised proforma and quality assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. Data were synthesised narratively and effect direction plots were produced for each outcome.Results Thirteen studies were included. Social-prescribing interventions were evaluated in 10 studies, collaborative care in two studies, and a new model of care in one study. Positive results (based on effect direction) were reported for the impact of the interventions on wellbeing in groups that were socioeconomically deprived. Inconsistent (mainly positive) results were reported for anxiety and depression. One study reported that people from the group with least deprivation, compared with the group with greatest deprivation, benefitted most from these interventions. Overall, study quality was weak.Conclusion Targeting non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions at areas of socioeconomic deprivation may help to reduce inequalities in mental health outcomes. However, only tentative conclusions can be drawn from the evidence in this review and more-robust research is required.
引用
收藏
页码:E242 / E248
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Which Non-Pharmaceutical Primary Care Interventions Reduce Inequalities in Common Mental Health Disorders? A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies
    Tanner, Louise
    Sowden, Sarah
    Still, Madeleine
    Thomson, Katie
    Bambra, Clare
    Wildman, Josephine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (24)
  • [2] Interventions to promote or improve the mental health of primary care nurses: a systematic review
    Duhoux, Arnaud
    Menear, Matthew
    Charron, Maude
    Lavoie-Tremblay, Melanie
    Alderson, Marie
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 25 (08) : 597 - 607
  • [3] Adopting and assimilating new non-pharmaceutical technologies into health care: a systematic review
    Robert, Glenn
    Greenhalgh, Trisha
    MacFarlane, Fraser
    Peacock, Richard
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2010, 15 (04) : 243 - 250
  • [4] Mental health interventions for children in foster care: A systematic review
    Hambrick, Erin P.
    Oppenheim-Weller, Shani
    N'zi, Amanda M.
    Taussig, Heather N.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2016, 70 : 65 - 77
  • [5] The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review
    Banholzer, Nicolas
    Lison, Adrian
    Ozcelik, Dennis
    Stadler, Tanja
    Feuerriegel, Stefan
    Vach, Werner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 37 (10) : 1003 - 1024
  • [6] The methodologies to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: a systematic review
    Nicolas Banholzer
    Adrian Lison
    Dennis Özcelik
    Tanja Stadler
    Stefan Feuerriegel
    Werner Vach
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2022, 37 : 1003 - 1024
  • [7] Interventions to improve the use of EMRs in primary health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hamade, Noura
    Terry, Amanda
    Malvankar-Mehta, Monali
    BMJ HEALTH & CARE INFORMATICS, 2019, 26 (01)
  • [8] Is there a case for mental health promotion in the primary care setting? A systematic review
    Fernandez, Ana
    Moreno-Peral, Patricia
    Zabaleta-del-Olmo, Edurne
    Angel Bellon, Juan
    Manuel Aranda-Regules, Jose
    Vicente Luciano, Juan
    Serrano-Blanco, Antoni
    Rubio-Valera, Maria
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 76 : S5 - S11
  • [9] A systematic scoping review of peer support interventions in integrated primary youth mental health care
    Murphy, Rachel
    Huggard, Leigh
    Fitzgerald, Amanda
    Hennessy, Eilis
    Booth, Ailbhe
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 52 (01) : 154 - 180
  • [10] Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions targeted at COVID-19 pandemic on influenza burden - a systematic review
    Fricke, Lara Marleen
    Glockner, Stephan
    Dreier, Maren
    Lange, Berit
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2021, 82 (01) : 1 - 35