DROID: dose-ranging approach to optimizing dose in oncology drug development

被引:22
作者
Guo, Beibei [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Expt Stat, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
dose-response relationship; maximum tolerated dose; optimal dose; risk-benefit assessment; targeted drugs; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; CLINICAL-TRIALS; TOXICITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/biom.13840
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the era of targeted therapy, there has been increasing concern about the development of oncology drugs based on the "more is better" paradigm, developed decades ago for chemotherapy. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated Project Optimus to reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development. To accommodate this paradigm shifting, we propose a dose-ranging approach to optimizing dose (DROID) for oncology trials with targeted drugs. DROID leverages the well-established dose-ranging study framework, which has been routinely used to develop non-oncology drugs for decades, and bridges it with established oncology dose-finding designs to optimize the dose of oncology drugs. DROID consists of two seamlessly connected stages. In the first stage, patients are sequentially enrolled and adaptively assigned to investigational doses to establish the therapeutic dose range (TDR), defined as the range of doses with acceptable toxicity and efficacy profiles, and the recommended phase 2 dose set (RP2S). In the second stage, patients are randomized to the doses in RP2S to assess the dose-response relationship and identify the optimal dose. The simulation study shows that DROID substantially outperforms the conventional approach, providing a new paradigm to efficiently optimize the dose of targeted oncology drugs. DROID aligns with the approach of a randomized, parallel dose-response trial design recommended by the FDA in the Guidance on Optimizing the Dosage of Human Prescription Drugs and Biological Products for the Treatment of Oncologic Diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:2907 / 2919
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   The bivariate continual reassessment method: extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes [J].
Braun, TA .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (03) :240-256
[2]   Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in dose-response studies [J].
Bretz, F ;
Pinheiro, JC ;
Branson, M .
BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (03) :738-748
[3]  
CHEVRET S, 1993, STAT MED, V12, P1093
[4]   Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification [J].
Cunanan, Kristen ;
Koopmeiners, Joseph S. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
[5]   A Simulation Study to Compare New Adaptive Dose-Ranging Designs [J].
Dragalin, Vladimir ;
Bornkamp, Bjoern ;
Bretz, Frank ;
Miller, Frank ;
Padmanabhan, S. Krishna ;
Patel, Nitin ;
Perevozskaya, Inna ;
Pinheiro, Jose ;
Smith, Jonathan R. .
STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 2 (04) :487-512
[6]   Bayesian inference on order-constrained parameters in generalized linear models [J].
Dunson, DB .
BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (02) :286-295
[7]   Bayesian Phase I/II Biomarker-Based Dose Finding for Precision Medicine With Molecularly Targeted Agents [J].
Guo, Beibei ;
Yuan, Ying .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 112 (518) :508-520
[8]   Dimension of model parameter space and operating characteristics in adaptive dose-finding studies [J].
Iasonos, Alexia ;
Wages, Nolan A. ;
Conaway, Mark R. ;
Cheung, Ken ;
Yuan, Ying ;
O'Quigley, John .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (21) :3760-3775
[9]   Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials With Delayed Outcomes [J].
Jin, Ick Hoon ;
Liu, Suyu ;
Thall, Peter F. ;
Yuan, Ying .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 109 (506) :525-536
[10]  
Lin R., 2020, JCO PRECIS ONCOL, V16, P1392