A Retrospective Study on tDCS Treatment in Patients with Drug-Resistant Chronic Pain

被引:1
作者
Perez-Borrego, Yolanda A. [1 ]
Soto-Leon, Vanesa [1 ]
Brocalero-Camacho, Angela [1 ,2 ]
Oliviero, Antonio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Carrasco-Lopez, Carmen [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] SESCAM, Hosp Nacl Paraplejicos, FENNSI Grp, Toledo 45071, Spain
[2] SESCAM, Hosp Paraplejicos, Unidad Neurol, Toledo 45071, Spain
[3] Hosp Los Madronos, Brunete 28690, Spain
[4] Univ Malmo, Internet Things & People, Malmo 21119, Sweden
[5] Univ Seville, Dept Anat, Seville 41009, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
chronic pain; tDCS; NIBS; pain intensity; motor cortex; DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION; SAFETY; CLASSIFICATION; FIBROMYALGIA; GUIDELINES; INTENSITY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.3390/biomedicines12010115
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) has an analgesic effect superior to a placebo in chronic pain. Some years ago, tDCS was implemented at the Hospital Nacional of Paraplegics (Toledo, Spain) to treat patients with pharmacological resistance to chronic pain. Objective. The main objectives of this study with tDCS were (1) to confirm the safety of one-year treatment; (2) to estimate the number of patients after one year in treatment; (3) to describe the effects of tDCS on the pain intensity during one-year treatment; and (4) to identify factors related to treatment success. Methods. This was a retrospective study conducted at the National Hospital for Paraplegics with 155 patients with pharmacologically resistant chronic pain. Anodal tDCS was applied over the M1 for 20 min at 1.5 mA for 10 treatment sessions from Monday to Friday (Induction phase), followed by 2-3 sessions per month (Maintenance phase). Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results. Anodal tDCS on M1 confirmed the reduction in the pain intensity. Moreover, 58% of outpatients completed one year of treatment. Only the VAS values obtained during the baseline influenced the response to treatment. Patients with a very high VAS at the baseline were more likely to not respond adequately to tDCS treatment. Conclusions. Anodal tDCS over M1 is an adequate therapy (safe and efficient) to treat drug-resistant chronic pain. Moreover, pain intensity at the start of treatment could be a predictor of patients' continuity with tDCS for at least one year.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex Ameliorates Chronic Pain and Reduces Short Intracortical Inhibition
    Antal, Andrea
    Terney, Daniella
    Kuehnl, Stefanie
    Paulus, Walter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2010, 39 (05) : 890 - 903
  • [2] INTERNATIONAL-CONFERENCE ON HARMONIZATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE (ICH)
    BABER, N
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 37 (05) : 401 - 404
  • [3] AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION
    BECK, AT
    ERBAUGH, J
    WARD, CH
    MOCK, J
    MENDELSOHN, M
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) : 561 - &
  • [4] Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016
    Bikson, Marom
    Grossman, Pnina
    Thomas, Chris
    Zannou, Adantchede Louis
    Jiang, Jimmy
    Adnan, Tatheer
    Mourdoukoutas, Antonios P.
    Kronberg, Greg
    Truong, Dennis
    Boggio, Paulo
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Charvet, Leigh
    Fregni, Felipe
    Fritsch, Brita
    Gillick, Bernadette
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    Hampstead, Benjamin M.
    Jankord, Ryan
    Kirton, Adam
    Knotkova, Helena
    Liebetanz, David
    Liu, Anli
    Loo, Colleen
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Reis, Janine
    Richardson, Jessica D.
    Rotenberg, Alexander
    Turkeltaub, Peter E.
    Woods, Adam J.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (05) : 641 - 661
  • [5] Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on chronic drug-resistant pain patients treated using brain stimulation approaches
    Brocalero-Camacho, Angela
    Perez-Borrego, Yolanda A.
    Soto-Leon, Vanesa
    Jesus Rodriguez-Matas, Maria
    Foffani, Guglielmo
    Oliviero, Antonio
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (04) : 1089 - 1090
  • [6] A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation
    Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
    Amadera, Joao
    Berbel, Bruna
    Volz, Magdalena Sarah
    Rizzerio, Brenno Gomes
    Fregni, Felipe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 14 (08) : 1133 - 1145
  • [7] Fibromyalgia: Prevalence, epidemiologic profiles and economic costs
    Cabo-Meseguer, Asensi
    Cerda-Olmedo, German
    Luis Trillo-Mata, Jose
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 2017, 149 (10): : 441 - 448
  • [8] EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain
    Cruccu, G.
    Aziz, T. Z.
    Garcia-Larrea, L.
    Hansson, P.
    Jensen, T. S.
    Lefaucheur, J.-P.
    Simpson, B. A.
    Taylor, R. S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2007, 14 (09) : 952 - 970
  • [9] Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
    Farrar, JT
    Young, JP
    LaMoreaux, L
    Werth, JL
    Poole, RM
    [J]. PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [10] What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects
    Fertonani, Anna
    Ferrari, Clarissa
    Miniussi, Carlo
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (11) : 2181 - 2188