Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care

被引:25
作者
Peng, Henry T. [1 ]
Siddiqui, M. Musaab [1 ]
Rhind, Shawn G. G. [1 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
da Luz, Luis Teodoro [2 ]
Beckett, Andrew [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Res Ctr, Def Res & Dev Canada, Toronto, ON M3K 2C9, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[3] St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[4] Royal Canadian Med Serv, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K2, Canada
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Hemorrhage; Machine learning; Trauma; Injury; MASSIVE TRANSFUSION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DECISION-SUPPORT; SCORING SYSTEMS; LIFESAVING INTERVENTIONS; EXTERNAL-VALIDATION; PREHOSPITAL TRIAGE; OUTCOME PREDICTION; INJURY SEVERITY; VITAL SIGNS;
D O I
10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI), a branch of machine learning (ML) has been increasingly employed in the research of trauma in various aspects. Hemorrhage is the most common cause of trauma-related death. To better elucidate the current role of AI and contribute to future development of ML in trauma care, we conducted a review focused on the use of ML in the diagnosis or treatment strategy of traumatic hemorrhage. A literature search was carried out on PubMed and Google scholar. Titles and abstracts were screened and, if deemed appropriate, the full articles were reviewed. We included 89 studies in the review. These studies could be grouped into five areas: (1) prediction of outcomes; (2) risk assessment and injury severity for triage; (3) prediction of transfusions; (4) detection of hemorrhage; and (5) prediction of coagulopathy. Performance analysis of ML in comparison with current standards for trauma care showed that most studies demonstrated the benefits of ML models. However, most studies were retrospective, focused on prediction of mortality, and development of patient outcome scoring systems. Few studies performed model assessment via test datasets obtained from different sources. Prediction models for transfusions and coagulopathy have been developed, but none is in widespread use. AI-enabled ML-driven technology is becoming integral part of the whole course of trauma care. Comparison and application of ML algorithms using different datasets from initial training, testing and validation in prospective and randomized controlled trials are warranted for provision of decision support for individualized patient care as far forward as possible.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   A statistically rigorous deep neural network approach to predict mortality in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit [J].
Ahmed, Fahad Shabbir ;
Ali, Liaqat ;
Joseph, Bellal A. ;
Ikram, Asad ;
Ul Mustafa, Raza ;
Bukhari, Syed Ahmad Chan .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2020, 89 (04) :736-742
[2]  
Almaghrabi F, 2020, WD SCI P COMP ENG, V12, P849
[3]   An evidential reasoning rule based feature selection for improving trauma outcome prediction [J].
Almaghrabi, Fatima ;
Xu, Dong-Ling ;
Yang, Jian-Bo .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 103
[4]  
[Anonymous], Covidence systematic review software
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, MEDICAL IMAGING 2019
[6]   Spotlight on animal models of acute traumatic coagulopathy: an update [J].
Ask, Antje ;
Eltringham-Smith, Louise ;
Bhakta, Varsha ;
Donkor, David A. ;
Pryzdial, Edward L. G. ;
Sheffield, William P. .
TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE, 2022, 61 (02)
[7]  
Batchinsk AI, 2009, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V5651, P390, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02976-9_55
[8]   Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques with UKTRISS for estimating probability of survival after trauma [J].
Becalick, DC ;
Coats, TJ .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2001, 51 (01) :123-133
[9]   IMMEDIATE VERSUS DELAYED FLUID RESUSCITATION FOR HYPOTENSIVE PATIENTS WITH PENETRATING TORSO INJURIES [J].
BICKELL, WH ;
WALL, MJ ;
PEPE, PE ;
MARTIN, RR ;
GINGER, VF ;
ALLEN, MK ;
MATTOX, KL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (17) :1105-1109
[10]  
Bradley M, 2020, WORLD J SURG, V44, P2255, DOI 10.1007/s00268-019-05294-3