Procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol (PSA) for gynecologic surgery: A systematic review of the literature

被引:1
作者
van der Meulen, Julia F. [1 ,2 ]
Fisch, Charlotte [1 ,3 ]
Dreessen, Janique R. J. [4 ]
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. [1 ]
Kok, Helen S. [5 ]
Bongers, Marlies Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, POB 777, NL-5500 MB Veldhoven, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Grow Sch Oncol & Reprod, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[5] Alrijne Ziekenhuis, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Gynecologic surgery; Procedural sedation and analgesia; Propofol; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; ADVERSE EVENTS; OPERATING-ROOM; OUTPATIENT; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.035
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify which gynecologic procedures are eligible to be performed under PSA with propofol and to describe safety and effectiveness of these procedures in this setting.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in Pubmed (MEDLINE), Embase and The Cochrane Library from inception until September 21st 2022. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials were included when they reported on clinical outcomes of gy-necologic procedures under procedural sedation and analgesia in which propofol was used as an anesthetic. Studies were excluded when sedation without propofol was used, when they only mentioned the use of proce-dural sedation and analgesia but did not describe any clinical outcome parameters or when < 10 patients were included. The primary outcome parameter was completeness of procedure. Secondary outcome parameters were type of gynecologic procedure, intraoperative complication rate, patient satisfaction, postoperative pain, duration of hospital admission, patient's discomfort and ease of procedure as judged by the surgeon. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and the ROBINS-I tool were used for bias assessment. A narrative synthesis of the findings from the included studies was provided. Numbers and percentages were presented, as well as means with standard deviations and medians with interquartile range where applicable.Results: Eight studies were included. A total of 914 patients underwent gynecologic surgical procedures with procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol. Gynecological procedures varied from hysteroscopic proced-ures, vaginal prolapse surgery and laparoscopic procedures. The percentage of complete procedures was 89.8%-100%. Complications occurred in 0-6.5% of patients. Other outcomes were measured in various ways, but overall patient satisfaction was high and postoperative pain was low.Conclusion: The use of PSA with propofol is promising for a wide range of gynecologic procedures, including hysteroscopic procedures, vaginal prolapse surgery and laparoscopic procedures. The use of PSA with propofol seems to be effective and safe and leads to high degree of patient satisfaction. More research is needed in order to determine for which types of procedures PSA can be used.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Gross JB, 2002, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V96, P1004
  • [12] The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Gotzsche, Peter C.
    Jueni, Peter
    Moher, David
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Savovic, Jelena
    Schulz, Kenneth F.
    Weeks, Laura
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
  • [13] Laparoscopic Sterilization Under Local Anesthesia with Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia: Systematic Review of the Literature
    Huppelschoten, Aleida G.
    Bijleveld, Kim
    Braams, Loes
    Schoot, Benedictus C.
    van Vliet, Huib A. A. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) : 393 - 401
  • [14] Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, 2012, TOETS SED AN BUIT OP
  • [15] Clinical policy for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department
    Jagoda, AS
    Campbell, M
    Karas, S
    Mariani, PJ
    Shepherd, SM
    Cantrill, SV
    Colucciello, SA
    Dalsey, WC
    Fesmire, FM
    Gallagher, EJ
    Murphy, BA
    Pietrzak, MP
    Sayers, DG
    Whitson, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 31 (05) : 663 - 677
  • [16] Analysis of Adverse Events Associated With Adult Moderate Procedural Sedation Outside the Operating Room
    Karamnov, Sergey
    Sarkisian, Natalia
    Grammer, Rebecca
    Gross, Wendy L.
    Urman, Richard D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2017, 13 (03) : 111 - 121
  • [17] Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomised controlled trial
    Kremer, C
    Duffy, S
    Moroney, M
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7230) : 279 - 282
  • [18] Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, 2009, RICHTL SED OF AN PSA
  • [19] Patient-controlled sedation for outpatient thermal balloon endometrial ablation
    Lok, IH
    Chan, M
    Tam, WH
    Leung, PL
    Yuen, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2002, 9 (04): : 436 - 441
  • [20] High Patient Satisfaction With Local Anesthesia and Light Sedation in a Novel Fast-Track Setup for Sacrospinous Fixation
    Lydiksen, Henriette Arenholt
    Glavind-Kristensen, Marianne
    Greisen, Susanne
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (12): : 758 - 762