Procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol (PSA) for gynecologic surgery: A systematic review of the literature

被引:1
作者
van der Meulen, Julia F. [1 ,2 ]
Fisch, Charlotte [1 ,3 ]
Dreessen, Janique R. J. [4 ]
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. [1 ]
Kok, Helen S. [5 ]
Bongers, Marlies Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, POB 777, NL-5500 MB Veldhoven, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Grow Sch Oncol & Reprod, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[5] Alrijne Ziekenhuis, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Gynecologic surgery; Procedural sedation and analgesia; Propofol; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; ADVERSE EVENTS; OPERATING-ROOM; OUTPATIENT; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.035
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify which gynecologic procedures are eligible to be performed under PSA with propofol and to describe safety and effectiveness of these procedures in this setting.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted in Pubmed (MEDLINE), Embase and The Cochrane Library from inception until September 21st 2022. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials were included when they reported on clinical outcomes of gy-necologic procedures under procedural sedation and analgesia in which propofol was used as an anesthetic. Studies were excluded when sedation without propofol was used, when they only mentioned the use of proce-dural sedation and analgesia but did not describe any clinical outcome parameters or when < 10 patients were included. The primary outcome parameter was completeness of procedure. Secondary outcome parameters were type of gynecologic procedure, intraoperative complication rate, patient satisfaction, postoperative pain, duration of hospital admission, patient's discomfort and ease of procedure as judged by the surgeon. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and the ROBINS-I tool were used for bias assessment. A narrative synthesis of the findings from the included studies was provided. Numbers and percentages were presented, as well as means with standard deviations and medians with interquartile range where applicable.Results: Eight studies were included. A total of 914 patients underwent gynecologic surgical procedures with procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol. Gynecological procedures varied from hysteroscopic proced-ures, vaginal prolapse surgery and laparoscopic procedures. The percentage of complete procedures was 89.8%-100%. Complications occurred in 0-6.5% of patients. Other outcomes were measured in various ways, but overall patient satisfaction was high and postoperative pain was low.Conclusion: The use of PSA with propofol is promising for a wide range of gynecologic procedures, including hysteroscopic procedures, vaginal prolapse surgery and laparoscopic procedures. The use of PSA with propofol seems to be effective and safe and leads to high degree of patient satisfaction. More research is needed in order to determine for which types of procedures PSA can be used.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 146
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Asgari Z, 2017, PAIN RES MANAG, V2017, P1
  • [2] Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: Analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments
    Bettocchi, S
    Ceci, O
    Nappi, L
    Di Venere, R
    Masciopinto, V
    Pansini, V
    Pinto, L
    Santoro, A
    Cormio, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2004, 11 (01): : 59 - 61
  • [3] International Consensus Statement for Recommended Terminology Describing Hysteroscopic Procedures
    Carugno, Jose
    Grimbizis, Grigoris
    Franchini, Mario
    Alonso, Luis
    Bradley, Linda
    Campo, Rudi
    Catena, Ursula
    Carlo, De Angelis
    Attilio, Di Spiezio Sardo
    Martin, Farrugia
    Haimovich, Sergio
    Isaacson, Keith
    Moawad, Nash
    Saridogan, Ertan
    Clark, T. Justin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (03) : 385 - 391
  • [4] Parenterally Administered Moderate Sedation and Paracervical Block Versus General Anesthesia for Hysteroscopic Polypectomy: A Pilot Study Comparing Postoperative Outcomes
    Centini, Gabriele
    Calonaci, Andrea
    Lazzeri, Lucia
    Tosti, Claudia
    Palomba, Caterina
    Puzzutiello, Rosa
    Luisi, Stefano
    Petraglia, Felice
    Zupi, Errico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) : 193 - 198
  • [5] Procedural sedation in the ICU and emergency department
    Chawla, Nikhil
    Boateng, Adjoa
    Deshpande, Ranjit
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (04) : 507 - 512
  • [6] Four year evaluation of therapeutic hysteroscopy under procedural sedation in an outpatient clinic
    Cornelissen, Lisa G. H.
    Kortekaas, Joep C.
    Schoot, Benedictus C.
    van Vliet, Huib A. A. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 261 : 65 - 71
  • [7] The Incidence and Nature of Adverse Events During Pediatric Sedation/Anesthesia With Propofol for Procedures Outside the Operating Room: A Report From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium
    Cravero, Joseph P.
    Beach, Michael L.
    Blike, George T.
    Gallagher, Susan M.
    Hertzog, James H.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 108 (03) : 795 - 804
  • [8] Conscious sedation for office hysteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    De Silva, Prathiba M.
    Carnegy, Alasdair
    Graham, Christopher
    Smith, Paul P.
    Clark, T. Justin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 266 : 89 - 98
  • [9] Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
    Garewal, Davinder
    Powell, Steve
    Milan, Stephen J.
    Nordmeyer, Jonas
    Waikar, Pallavi
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (06):
  • [10] Clinical Policy: Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency Department
    Godwin, Steven A.
    Burton, John H.
    Gerardo, Charles J.
    Hatten, Benjamin W.
    Mace, Sharon E.
    Silvers, Scott M.
    Fesmire, Francis M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 63 (02) : 247 - 258