Camps, not just parties. The dynamic foundations of affective polarization in multi-party systems

被引:22
作者
Bantel, Ivo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Dept Polit Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Affective polarization; Political identity; Multi-party systems; Radical right; Hierarchical models; MULTILEVEL MODELS; PARTY; CONSEQUENCES; CITIZENS;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102614
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Concerns over affective polarization in Western democracies are growing. But which broader political distinctions are also affective demarcations? As inter-party cooperation is the rule in multi-party democracies, explaining affective polarization beyond partisan divisions is crucial. I argue that demarcations between political camps deepen affective polarization, and country-level factors influence the relevance of these affective divides. Based on survey data from 23 Western democracies (1996-2019), I demonstrate that affect is most polarized between Left and Right camps, and between the Radical Right and other camps. Further, these divides are dynamic and depend on different country-level outcomes. The Left/Right divide disappears when Left and Right parties govern together, while the Radical Right divide is fortified with Radical Right electoral success. These findings highlight that affective polarization's group foundations extend beyond partisanship, and that affective polarization could even act as a defence mechanism against radical challengers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Armingeon K., 2022, Comparative Political Data Set 1960-2020
[2]  
Bartolini Stefano., 1990, Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885-1985
[3]   Party Competition and Cooperation Shape Affective Polarization: Evidence from Natural and Survey Experiments in Israel [J].
Bassan-Nygate, Lotem ;
Weiss, Chagai M. .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2022, 55 (02) :287-318
[4]   Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament? [J].
Bischof, Daniel ;
Wagner, Markus .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 63 (04) :888-904
[5]  
Bobbio Norberto., 1997, LEFT RIGHT SIGNIFICA
[6]   Democratic Electoral Systems around the world, 1946-2011 [J].
Bormann, Nils-Christian ;
Golder, Matt .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2013, 32 (02) :360-369
[7]   Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies [J].
Brader, Ted ;
Tucker, Joshua A. ;
Duell, Dominik .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2013, 46 (11) :1485-1517
[8]  
Bullock John G., 2020, The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, P128, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.013.2, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.013.2., DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190860806.001.0001/OXFORDHB-9780190860806-E-2]
[9]   The asymmetrical structure of left/right disagreement: Left-wing coherence and right-wing fragmentation in comparative party policy [J].
Cochrane, Christopher .
PARTY POLITICS, 2013, 19 (01) :104-121
[10]  
CPS, 2020, CSES INT MOD DAT IMD