A robust TOPSIS method for decision making problems with hierarchical and non-monotonic criteria

被引:45
作者
Corrente, Salvatore [1 ]
Tasiou, Menelaos [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Dept Econ & Business, Corso Italia 55, I-95129 Catania, Italy
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business Sch, Richmond Bldg, Portland St, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
关键词
TOPSIS; Non-monotonic criteria; Qualitative criteria; Normalization; Hierarchy of criteria; Robustness concerns; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; ORDINAL REGRESSION; NEURAL-NETWORK; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; SET; ENVELOPMENT; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119045
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper introduces an extension of a well-known Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding method, namely the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Most of the TOPSIS applications assume that preferences are monotonic for each evaluation criterion and that qualitative scales are converted into quantitative ones before the method is applied. However, both assumptions have been subject of discussion and criticism in the literature. To this solution, this paper introduces a normalization technique based on simulations that permit taking into account non-monotonic preferences as well as qualitative criteria. An additional novelty lies in the integration of the Multiple Criteria Hierarchy Process, which extends the applicability of the method to problems in which criteria are hierarchically structured. To deal with robustness concerns, the Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis will be used in the new proposal, giving information in statistical terms on the goodness of the considered alternatives. The new method has been applied to evaluate a set of banks listed in the LSE's FTSE350 Index.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Normalization in TOPSIS-based approaches with data of different nature: application to the ranking of mathematical videos [J].
Acuna-Soto, C. ;
Liern, V. ;
Perez-Gladish, B. .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 296 (1-2) :541-569
[2]   Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis [J].
Allen, R ;
Thanassoulis, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 154 (02) :363-379
[3]   Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution, development and future directions [J].
Allen, R ;
Athanassopoulos, A ;
Dyson, RG ;
Thanassoulis, E .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 73 (0) :13-34
[4]   Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem [J].
Angilella, Silvia ;
Corrente, Salvatore ;
Greco, Salvatore .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 240 (01) :172-182
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ISO 26000:2010
[6]  
Barone D, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6998, P448, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24606-7_35
[7]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[8]  
Berger AllenN., 2001, Prudential Supervision: What Works and What Doesn't, P301, DOI [DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226531939.003.0009, 10.7208/chicago/9780226531939.003.0009]
[9]   Comparing market and supervisory assessments of bank performance: Who knows what when? [J].
Berger, AN ;
Davies, SM ;
Flannery, MJ .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2000, 32 (03) :641-667
[10]  
Bhutia Pema Wangchen., 2012, IOSR Journal of Engineering, V2, P43, DOI [DOI 10.9790/3021-021034350, 10.9790/3021-021034350]