Changes in resource perception throughout the foraging visit contribute to task specialization in the honey bee Apis mellifera

被引:5
作者
Moreno, Emilia [1 ,2 ]
Arenas, Andres [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Ciencias Exactas & Nat, Dept Biodivers & Biol Expt, Lab Insectos Sociales, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, Inst Fisiol Biol Mol & Neurociencias IFIBYNE, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
DIVISION-OF-LABOR; SUCROSE RESPONSE THRESHOLDS; PROBOSCIS EXTENSION; RESPONSIVENESS; BEHAVIOR; GENOTYPE; POLLEN; TACTILE; MEMORY; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-35163-y
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Division of labor is central to the ecological success of social insects. Among foragers of the honey bee, specialization for collecting nectar or pollen correlates with their sensitivity to sucrose. So far, differences in gustatory perception have been mostly studied in bees returning to the hive, but not during foraging. Here, we showed that the phase of the foraging visit (i.e. beginning or end) interacts with foraging specialization (i.e. predisposition to collect pollen or nectar) to modulate sucrose and pollen sensitivity in foragers. In concordance with previous studies, pollen foragers presented higher sucrose responsiveness than nectar foragers at the end of the foraging visit. On the contrary, pollen foragers were less responsive than nectar foragers at the beginning of the visit. Consistently, free-flying foragers accepted less concentrated sucrose solution during pollen gathering than immediately after entering the hive. Pollen perception also changes throughout foraging, as pollen foragers captured at the beginning of the visit learned and retained memories better when they were conditioned with pollen + sucrose as reward than when we used sucrose alone. Altogether, our results support the idea that changes in foragers' perception throughout the foraging visit contributes to task specialization.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Learned olfactory cues affect pollen-foraging preferences in honeybees, Apis mellifera [J].
Arenas, A. ;
Farina, W. M. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2012, 83 (04) :1023-1033
[2]   Correlation between octopaminergic signalling and foraging task specialisation in honeybees [J].
Arenas, Andres ;
Lajad, Rocio ;
Peng, Tianfei ;
Grueter, Christoph ;
Farina, Walter .
GENES BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2021, 20 (04)
[3]   Pheromone components affect motivation and induce persistent modulation of associative learning and memory in honey bees [J].
Baracchi, David ;
Cabirol, Amelie ;
Devaud, Jean-Marc ;
Haase, Albrecht ;
d'Ettorre, Patrizia ;
Giurfa, Martin .
COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2020, 3 (01)
[4]   Pheromones modulate reward responsiveness and non-associative learning in honey bees [J].
Baracchi, David ;
Devaud, Jean-Marc ;
d'Ettorre, Patrizia ;
Giurfa, Martin .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[5]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[6]   Models of division of labor in social insects [J].
Beshers, SN ;
Fewell, JH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2001, 46 :413-440
[7]   The short neuropeptide F regulates appetitive but not aversive responsiveness in a social insect [J].
Bestea, Louise ;
Paoli, Marco ;
Arrufat, Patrick ;
Ronsin, Brice ;
Carcaud, Julie ;
Sandoz, Jean-Christophe ;
Velarde, Rodrigo ;
Giurfa, Martin ;
Sanchez, Maria Gabriela de Brito .
ISCIENCE, 2022, 25 (01)
[8]   CLASSICAL-CONDITIONING OF PROBOSCIS EXTENSION IN HONEYBEES (APIS-MELLIFERA) [J].
BITTERMAN, ME ;
MENZEL, R ;
FIETZ, A ;
SCHAFER, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 97 (02) :107-119
[9]  
Blatt J, 2001, J EXP BIOL, V204, P2709
[10]   Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies [J].
Bonabeau, E ;
Theraulaz, G ;
Deneubourg, JL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 263 (1376) :1565-1569