The dark side of AI identity: Investigating when and why AI identity entitles unethical behavior

被引:39
作者
Cao, Limei [1 ]
Chen, Chen [1 ]
Dong, Xiaowei [1 ]
Wang, Manyi [2 ]
Qin, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat sen Univ, Sch Business, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Renmin Sch Business, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; AI identity; Unethical behavior; Psychological entitlement; Role identity theory; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY IDENTITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ENTITLEMENT; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; SELF; MEDIATION; INTELLIGENCE; CREATIVITY; WORK; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2023.107669
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
With its rapid development and significant benefits, increasingly more organizations have adopted artificial intelligence (AI) and taken various ways to promote employees' AI usage and AI-related support behaviors. As a primary way to promote AI usage and AI-related supportive behaviors, building an AI identity is widely recognized as having beneficial effects on employees' work attitudes and outcomes. Drawing upon role identity theory, we challenge this general conclusion by identifying a potential dark side of AI identity and investigating how and when AI identity promotes unethical behavior. Based on an experiment and a multi-wave field study, we found that AI identity had a positive indirect effect on unethical behavior via psychological entitlement. Furthermore, perceived rarity of AI identity moderated the observed effects-that is, when perceived rarity of AI identity was high, employees with AI identity were more likely to have psychological entitlement, which increased unethical behavior. Taken together, our findings provide new insights into the consequences of AI identity as well as reveal the importance of the rarity of AI identity and psychological entitlement in this process.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Alahmad R, 2020, AMCIS 2020 PROCEEDINGS
[2]  
Ambrose M.L., 1999, J MANAGERIAL ISSUES, V11, P454
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ENDLESS FRONTIER NEX, DOI DOI 10.17226/25990
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1983, SOCIAL PSYCHOL PERSP
[5]   The Impact of Automation of Systems on Medical Errors: Evidence from Field Research [J].
Aron, Ravi ;
Dutta, Shantanu ;
Janakiraman, Ramkumar ;
Pathak, Praveen A. .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) :429-446
[6]   The Moral Machine experiment [J].
Awad, Edmond ;
Dsouza, Sohan ;
Kim, Richard ;
Schulz, Jonathan ;
Henrich, Joseph ;
Shariff, Azim ;
Bonnefon, Jean-Francois ;
Rahwan, Iyad .
NATURE, 2018, 563 (7729) :59-+
[7]  
Bai B., 2020, IMPACTS ALGORITHMIC, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3550887
[8]  
Balakrishnan T., 2020, The state of AI in 2020
[9]   Mobile technology identity and self-efficacy: Implications for the adoption of clinically supported mobile health apps [J].
Balapour, Ali ;
Reychav, Iris ;
Sabherwal, Rajiv ;
Azuri, Joseph .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 :58-68
[10]   Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots [J].
Bartneck, Christoph ;
Kulic, Dana ;
Croft, Elizabeth ;
Zoghbi, Susana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2009, 1 (01) :71-81