When do property taxes matter? Tax salience and heterogeneous policy effects

被引:6
作者
Gindelsky, Marina [1 ]
Moulton, Jeremy [2 ]
Wentland, Kelly [3 ]
Wentland, Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] US Bur Econ Anal, Off Chief Economist, 4600 Silver Hill Rd, Suitland, MD 20746 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Publ Policy, Abernethy Hall,CB 3435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] George Mason Univ, Sch Business, Dept Accounting, 4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
Property tax; Price capitalization; Tax misperception; Linked data; ZTRAX; Tax salience; INCOME; VALUES; RATES; CAPITALIZATION; ECONOMICS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhe.2023.101951
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Taxes create incentives; yet, the potency of these incentives may depend on the salience and household perception of the tax itself. We investigate this issue in the context of property taxes, exploring how accurately households perceive their property tax liabilities and what factors determine misperception. Leveraging a unique national dataset, created by linking Zillow's ZTRAX data to internal data from the American Community Survey, we first compare survey responses for how much households think they pay in property taxes to how much they actually pay based on municipal administrative records from ZTRAX. While homeowner tax perceptions are not substantially biased on average, we observe significant inaccuracy and systematic bias across different household (er) characteristics, institutional settings, and across states. Given that the vast majority of studies in the property tax capitalization literature use data concentrated in one state or locality, we also explore whether variation in tax misperceptions across states can help explain the heterogeneity in property tax effects on home prices. Results from a meta-analysis show that studies conducted in states with higher property tax misperceptions are signif-icantly less likely to find property tax policy changes are fully capitalized into home prices.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics [J].
Angrist, Joshua D. ;
Pischke, Joern-Steffen .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 24 (02) :3-30
[2]   The Assessment Gap: Racial Inequalities in Property Taxation* [J].
Avenancio-Leon, Carlos F. ;
Howard, Troup .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2022, 137 (03) :1383-1434
[3]   PERCEPTIONS AND REALITIES OF AVERAGE TAX RATES IN THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX: EVIDENCE FROM MICHIGAN [J].
Ballard, Charles L. ;
Gupta, Sanjay .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2018, 71 (02) :263-294
[4]   Age-based property tax exemptions [J].
Banzhaf, H. Spencer ;
Mickey, Ryan ;
Patrick, Carlianne .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2021, 121
[5]   Assessing evidence for inattention to the costs of homeownership [J].
Bengali, Leila .
JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2022, 58
[6]   How well do individuals predict the selling prices of their homes? [J].
Benitez-Silva, Hugo ;
Eren, Selcuk ;
Heiland, Frank ;
Jimenez-Martin, Sergi .
JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2015, 29 :12-25
[7]   Tax Misperception and its Effects on Decision Making - Literature Review and Behavioral Taxpayer Response Model [J].
Blaufus, Kay ;
Chirvi, Malte ;
Huber, Hans-Peter ;
Maiterth, Ralf ;
Sureth-Sloane, Caren .
EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 31 (01) :111-144
[8]   Inattention to Deferred Increases in Tax Bases: How Michigan Home Buyers Are Paying for Assessment Limits [J].
Bradley, Sebastien .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2017, 99 (01) :53-66
[9]  
Buchanan JamesM., 1967, Public finance in democratic process: Fiscal institutions and individual choice
[10]  
Buchanan JamesRichard Wagner., 1977, Democracy in Deficit