Bayesian approaches to include real-world data in clinical studies

被引:5
作者
Muller, P. [1 ]
Chandra, N. K. [2 ]
Sarkar, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Stat & Data Sci, 2317 Speedway D9800, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Math Sci, 800 W Campbell Rd, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
来源
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES | 2023年 / 381卷 / 2247期
关键词
common atoms mixture model; propensity scores; real-world data; PROPENSITY SCORE; REGRESSION; DISTRIBUTIONS; TRIALS; ARM;
D O I
10.1098/rsta.2022.0158
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Randomized clinical trials have been the mainstay of clinical research, but are prohibitively expensive and subject to increasingly difficult patient recruitment. Recently, there is a movement to use real-world data (RWD) from electronic health records, patient registries, claims data and other sources in lieu of or supplementing controlled clinical trials. This process of combining information from diverse sources calls for inference under a Bayesian paradigm. We review some of the currently used methods and a novel non-parametric Bayesian (BNP) method. Carrying out the desired adjustment for differences in patient populations is naturally done with BNP priors that facilitate understanding of and adjustment for population heterogeneities across different data sources. We discuss the particular problem of using RWD to create a synthetic control arm to supplement single-arm treatment only studies. At the core of the proposed approach is the model-based adjustment to achieve equivalent patient populations in the current study and the (adjusted) RWD. This is implemented using common atoms mixture models. The structure of such models greatly simplifies inference. The adjustment for differences in the populations can be reduced to ratios of weights in such mixtures.This article is part of the theme issue 'Bayesian inference: challenges, perspectives, and prospects'.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 474
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT): A Bayesian Adaptive Platform Trial to Develop Precision Medicines for Patients With Glioblastoma [J].
Alexander, Brian M. ;
Trippa, Lorenzo ;
Gaffey, Sarah ;
Arrillaga-Romany, Isabel C. ;
Lee, Eudocia Q. ;
Rinne, Mikael L. ;
Ahluwalia, Manmeet S. ;
Colman, Howard ;
Fell, Geoffrey ;
Galanis, Evanthia ;
de Groot, John ;
Drappatz, Jan ;
Lassman, Andrew B. ;
Meredith, David M. ;
Nabors, L. Burt ;
Santagata, Sandro ;
Schiff, David ;
Welch, Mary R. ;
Ligon, Keith L. ;
Wen, Patrick Y. .
JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 3 :1-13
[2]  
Bernardo J. M., 2009, Bayesian theory, V405, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470316870
[3]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[4]  
Chandra NK, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2201.00068
[5]  
Chandra NK, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2006.02700
[6]   Propensity score-integrated composite likelihood approach for augmenting the control arm of a randomized controlled trial by incorporating real-world data [J].
Chen, Wei-Chen ;
Wang, Chenguang ;
Li, Heng ;
Lu, Nelson ;
Tiwari, Ram ;
Xu, Yunling ;
Yue, Lilly Q. .
JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2020, 30 (03) :508-520
[7]   BART: BAYESIAN ADDITIVE REGRESSION TREES [J].
Chipman, Hugh A. ;
George, Edward I. ;
McCulloch, Robert E. .
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2010, 4 (01) :266-298
[8]   Multi-study factor analysis [J].
De Vito, Roberta ;
Bellio, Ruggero ;
Trippa, Lorenzo ;
Parmigiani, Giovanni .
BIOMETRICS, 2019, 75 (01) :337-346
[9]  
Denison DGT, 1998, BIOMETRIKA, V85, P363
[10]   A Common Atoms Model for the Bayesian Nonparametric Analysis of Nested Data [J].
Denti, Francesco ;
Camerlenghi, Federico ;
Guindani, Michele ;
Mira, Antonietta .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 118 (541) :405-416