Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion Alone in the Treatment of Grade 1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

被引:3
作者
Tang, Alan R. [1 ]
Chanbour, Hani [2 ]
Steinle, Anthony M. [3 ]
Jonzzon, Soren [2 ]
Roth, Steven G. [2 ]
Gardocki, Raymond J. [2 ,3 ]
Stephens, Byron F. [2 ,3 ]
Abtahi, Amir M. [2 ,3 ]
Zuckerman, Scott L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, 1161 21st Ave South Suite T-4224, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
Grade; 1; spondylolisthesis; Interbody fusion; Reoperation; Complication; Readmission; Discharge disposition; Return to work; Patient-reported outcomes; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SURGERY; DISORDERS; PAIN; PLF;
D O I
10.1227/neu.0000000000002402
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterolateral fusion (PLF) alone are two operations performed to treat degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. To date, it is unclear which operation leads to better outcomes.OBJECTIVE: To compare TLIF vs PLF alone regarding long-term reoperation rates, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with degenerative grade 1 spondylolisthesis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data between October 2010 and May 2021 was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were patients aged 18 years or older with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing elective, single-level, open posterior lumbar decompression and instrumented fusion with =1-year follow-up. The primary exposure was presence of TLIF vs PLF without interbody fusion. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included complications, readmission, discharge disposition, return to work, and PROMs at 3 and 12 months postoperatively, including Numeric Rating Scale-Back/Leg and Oswestry Disability Index. Minimum clinically important difference of PROMs was set at 30% improvement from baseline.RESULTS: Of 546 patients, 373 (68.3%) underwent TLIF and 173 underwent (31.7%) PLF. Median follow-up was 6.1 years (IQR = 3.6-9.0), with 339 (62.1%) >5-year follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients undergoing TLIF had a lower odds of reoperation compared with PLF alone (odds ratio = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.54-0.99, P = .048). Among patients with >5-year follow-up, the same trend was seen (odds ratio = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03-0.95, P = .045). No differences were observed in 90-day complications (P = .487) and readmission rates (P = .230) or minimum clinically important difference PROMs.CONCLUSION: In a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained registry, patients with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis undergoing TLIF had significantly lower long-term reoperation rates than those undergoing PLF.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 197
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Does Fusion Method Influence Outcome? Four-Year Results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial [J].
Abdu, William A. ;
Lurie, Jon D. ;
Spratt, Kevin F. ;
Tosteson, Anna N. A. ;
Zhao, Wenyan ;
Tosteson, Tor D. ;
Herkowitz, Harry ;
Longely, Michael ;
Boden, Scott D. ;
Emery, Sanford ;
Weinstein, James N. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (21) :2351-2360
[2]   Augmenting posterolateral fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage improves clinical outcome, but not fusion rate, of posterior decompression [J].
Atici, Teoman ;
Yerebakan, Selcan ;
Ermutlu, Cenk ;
Ozyalcin, Ali .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (04)
[3]   Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis [J].
Austevoll, Ivar M. ;
Hermansen, Erland ;
Fagerland, Morten W. ;
Storheim, Kjersti ;
Brox, Jens I. ;
Solberg, Tore ;
Rekeland, Frode ;
Franssen, Eric ;
Weber, Clemens ;
Brisby, Helena ;
Grundnes, Oliver ;
Algaard, Knut R. H. ;
Boker, Tordis ;
Banitalebi, Hasan ;
Indrekvam, Kari ;
Hellum, Christian .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 385 (06) :526-538
[4]   Radiological and Clinical Comparison of Posterolateral Fusion and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Techniques in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis [J].
Bozkurt, Gokhan ;
Isikay, Ilkay ;
Hanalioglu, Sahin .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 116 :E1060-E1065
[5]   Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Definition, Natural History, Conservative Management, and Surgical Treatment [J].
Bydon, Mohamad ;
Alvi, Mohammed Ali ;
Goyal, Anshit .
NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 30 (03) :299-+
[6]   Posterolateral Fusion Versus Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Campbell, Ryan C. ;
Mobbs, Ralph J. ;
Lu, Victor M. ;
Xu, Joshua ;
Rao, Prashanth J. ;
Phan, Kevin .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 7 (05) :482-490
[7]   Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N2QOD data [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Ghogawala, Zoher ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Asher, Anthony L. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (06) :916-921
[8]   Summary of Guidelines for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis [J].
Chan, Andrew K. ;
Sharma, Viraj ;
Robinson, Leslie C. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 30 (03) :353-+
[9]   Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease [J].
Divi, Srikanth N. ;
Schroeder, Gregory D. ;
Goyal, Dhruv K. C. ;
Radcliff, Kristen E. ;
Galetta, Matthew S. ;
Hilibrand, Alan S. ;
Anderson, D. Greg ;
Kurd, Mark F. ;
Rihn, Jeffrey A. ;
Kaye, Ian D. ;
Woods, Barrett R. ;
Vaccaro, Alexander R. ;
Kepler, Christopher K. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (12) :1960-1968
[10]   A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Forsth, Peter ;
Olafsson, Gylfi ;
Carlsson, Thomas ;
Frost, Anders ;
Borgstrom, Fredrik ;
Fritzell, Peter ;
Ohagen, Patrik ;
Michaelsson, Karl ;
Sanden, Bengt .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (15) :1413-1423