Queensland Adult Deterioration Detection System observation chart diagnostic accuracy in detecting patient deterioration: A retrospective case-control study

被引:3
作者
Flenady, Tracy [1 ]
Dwyer, Trudy [1 ]
Signal, Tania [2 ]
Murray-Boyle, Cailem [2 ]
Le Lagadec, Danielle [3 ,6 ]
Kahl, Julie [4 ]
Browne, Matthew [5 ]
机构
[1] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Nursing v, 554-700 Yaamba Rd, Rockhampton, Qld 4701, Australia
[2] Med & Appl Sci Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Hlth, 554-700 Yaamba Rd, Rockhampton, Qld 4701, Australia
[3] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Social Sci, 6 Univ Dr, Bundaberg, Qld 4670, Australia
[4] Queensland Hlth, 2 Canning St, Rockhampton, Qld 4700, Australia
[5] Med & Appl Sci Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Hlth, 6 Univ Dr, Bundaberg, Qld 4670, Australia
[6] 6 Univ Dr, Bundaberg, Qld 4670, Australia
关键词
Clinical deterioration; Early Warning System; Severe adverse events; Track -and -trigger system; Case-control study; EARLY-WARNING-SCORE; CARDIAC-ARREST; DESIGN; NEWS; FLAGS; TRACK; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.colegn.2023.05.006
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Queensland Adult Deterioration Detection System (Q -ADDS) is the acute -care vital sign observation chart used widely throughout Queensland, Australia. The diagnostic accuracy of the chart in detecting patient deterioration is unknown. Aim: This study aims to assess how accurately the Q -ADDS observation chart predicts patient deterioration in acute -care hospitals and the contribution of each vital sign in predicting patient deterioration. Methods: This multi -centre retrospective case-control study compared vital sign data of 1152 patients that suffered a deterioration event and 1088 demographically and diagnostically matched non -deterioration patients. The efficacy of the Q -ADDS chart was determined by calculating the Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUROC) after logistic regression and Random Forest (RF) classification using the individual vital signs, and the aggregated Q -ADDS score. Findings: Q -ADDS predicted patient deterioration with above -chance accuracy 6 hours before the deterioration event (AUROC = 0.690), comparable to an optimised RF model using the same vital sign data. At the time of the deterioration event, the Q -ADDS performed at parity with the optimised model (AUROC = 0.907). The aggregated Q -ADDS score was a better predictor of patient deterioration than any individual vital sign. Discussion: Q -ADDS predictive validity is weaker than several other Early Warning Systems. However, its ability to discriminate between deteriorating and non -deteriorating patients is above the level expected by chance. No individual vital sign is a strong predictor of patient deterioration, but the aggregated weighted Q -ADDS score is a good deterioration predictor. Conclusion: The multivariable Q -ADDS score efficiently predicts clinical deterioration in acute -care hospitals, with the tool's discriminatory capacity increasing with proximity to the deterioration event. (c) 2023 Australian College of Nursing Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 785
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   The prevalence and significance of abnormal vital signs prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest [J].
Andersen, Lars W. ;
Kim, Won Young ;
Chase, Maureen ;
Berg, Katherine M. ;
Mortensen, Sharri J. ;
Moskowitz, Ari ;
Novack, Victor ;
Cocchi, Michael N. ;
Donnino, Michael W. .
RESUSCITATION, 2016, 98 :112-117
[2]   Recognising and responding to deteriorating patients: what difference do national standards make? [J].
Anstey, Matthew H. ;
Bhasale, Alice ;
Dunbar, Nicola J. ;
Buchan, Heather .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01) :639
[3]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2020, Causes of Death
[4]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2019, AUSTR I HLTH WELF HL, V90
[5]   Decision-tree early warning score (DTEWS) validates the design of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) [J].
Badriyah, Tessy ;
Briggs, James S. ;
Meredith, Paul ;
Jarvis, Stuart W. ;
Schmidt, Paul E. ;
Featherstone, Peter I. ;
Prytherch, David R. ;
Smith, Gary B. .
RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (03) :418-423
[6]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[7]   Predicting clinical deterioration with Q-ADDS compared to NEWS, Between the Flags, and eCART track and trigger tools [J].
Campbell, Victoria ;
Conway, Roger ;
Carey, Kyle ;
Tran, Khoa ;
Visser, Adam ;
Gifford, Shaune ;
McLanders, Mia ;
Edelson, Dana ;
Churpek, Matthew .
RESUSCITATION, 2020, 153 :28-34
[8]   Using Electronic Health Record Data to Develop and Validate a Prediction Model for Adverse Outcomes in the Wards [J].
Churpek, Matthew M. ;
Yuen, Trevor C. ;
Park, Seo Young ;
Gibbons, Robert ;
Edelson, Dana P. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (04) :841-848
[9]  
Cohen J., 1992, Current Directions in Psychological Science, V1, P98, DOI [10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783, DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.EP10768783]
[10]   Eye-tracking reveals how observation chart design features affect the detection of patient deterioration: An experimental study [J].
Cornish, Lillian ;
Hill, Andrew ;
Horswill, Mark S. ;
Becker, Stefanie I. ;
Watson, Marcus O. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2019, 75 :230-242