Validation of the Acoustic Breathiness Index in Speakers of Finnish Language

被引:0
作者
Kankare, Elina [1 ]
Laukkanen, Anne-Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil & Psychosocial Support,Logoped Phonia, Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ, Speech & Voice Res Lab, Tampere, Finland
关键词
dysphonia; hoarseness; GRBAS; acoustic noise detection; AUDITORY-PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION; VOICE QUALITY; PARTICIPATION PROFILE; RELIABILITY; DISORDERS; DYSPHONIA; RATIO;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12247607
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Breathiness (perception of turbulence noise in the voice) is one of the major components of hoarseness in dysphonic voices. This study aims to validate a multiparameter analysis tool, the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI), for quantification of breathiness in the speaking voice, including both sustained vowels and continuous speech. One hundred and eight speakers with dysphonia (28 M, 80 F, mean age 50, SD 15.4 years) and 87 non-dysphonic controls (18 M, 69 F, mean age 42, SD 14 years) volunteered as participants. They read a standard text and sustained vowel /a:/. Acoustic recordings were made using a head-mounted microphone. Acoustic samples were evaluated perceptually by nine voice experts of different backgrounds (speech therapists, vocologists and laryngologists). Breathiness (B) from the GRBAS scale was rated. Headphones were used in the perceptual analysis. The dysphonic and non-dysphonic speakers differed significantly from each other in the auditory perceptual evaluation of breathiness. A significant difference was also found for ABI, which had a mean value of 2.26 (SD 1.15) for non-dysphonic and 3.07 (SD 1.75) for dysphonic speakers. ABI correlated strongly with B (rs = 0.823, p = 0.01). ABI's power to distinguish the groups was high (88.6%). The highest sensitivity and specificity of ABI (80%) was obtained at threshold value 2.68. ABI is a valid tool for differentiating breathiness in non-dysphonic and dysphonic speakers of Finnish.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Aghajanzadeh Mahshid, 2023, J Voice, DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.07.002
[2]   The improvement of internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index [J].
Barsties, Ben ;
Maryn, Youri .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 36 (05) :647-656
[3]   Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements [J].
Bhuta, T ;
Patrick, L ;
Garnett, JD .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2004, 18 (03) :299-304
[4]   The Effect of Anchors and Training on the Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Stimuli [J].
Brinca, Lilia ;
Batista, Ana Paula ;
Tavares, Ana Ines ;
Pinto, Patricia N. ;
Araujo, Lara .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2015, 29 (06) :776.e7-776.e14
[5]   Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders [J].
Brockmann-Bauser, M. ;
Bohlender, J. E. ;
Mehta, D. D. .
JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2018, 32 (02) :162-168
[6]  
Colton R., 2006, UNDERSTANDING VOICE
[7]   Characteristics of a Dysphonic Population Referred for Voice Assessment and/or Voice Therapy [J].
de Bodt, Marc ;
Van den Steen, Leen ;
Mertens, Fons ;
Raes, Jan ;
Van Bel, Lieve ;
Heylen, Louis ;
Pattyn, Jos ;
Gordts, Frans ;
de Heyning, Paul van .
FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2015, 67 (04) :178-186
[8]  
Dejonckere P, 1996, Advances in clinical phonetics, V6, P217, DOI DOI 10.1075/SSPCL.6.13DEJ
[9]  
DEJONCKERE P H, 1987, Acta Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica Belgica, V41, P988
[10]   PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF DYSPHONIA - RELIABILITY AND RELEVANCE [J].
DEJONCKERE, PH ;
OBBENS, C ;
DEMOOR, GM ;
WIENEKE, GH .
FOLIA PHONIATRICA, 1993, 45 (02) :76-83