INVESTMENT PROJECTS EVALUATION IN A FUZZY ENVIRONMENT USING THE SIMPLIFIED WISP METHOD

被引:0
|
作者
Stanujkic, Dragisa [1 ]
Fedajev, Aleksandra [1 ]
Santos, Marcos [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Tech Fac Bor, Vojske Jugoslavije 12, Bor 19210, Serbia
[2] Inst Tecnol Aeronaut ITA, Praca Marechal Eduardo Gomes 50, BR-12228900 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
关键词
MCDM; fuzzy; triangular fuzzy numbers; Simplified WISP; investment projects; ENERGY;
D O I
10.5937/sjm18-44522
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the importance of investment activity for companies and the challenges they face when evaluating investment projects in a fuzzy environment, that is when decisions have to be made based on some predictions and uncertain or imprecise data. The study focuses on the usage of a new extension of the Simplified WISP (Weighted Sum Product) method, which allows the use of triangular fuzzy numbers, as a tool for evaluating investment projects and minimizing the risk associated with such decisions. Investment projects were evaluated based on the following criteria: Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Profitability Index, Payback Period, and Risk of project failure. The proposed extension of the Simplified WISP method can be used to solve other complex decision problems associated with predictions and uncertainties.The paper highlights the benefits of using this MCDM technique in investment project evaluation and the potential to improve decisionmaking processes. The study also discusses the challenges associated with applying MCDM techniques in a fuzzy environment and proposes solutions to overcome them. It also provides valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers interested in investment evaluation and decision-making processes.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 235
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of power plants to prioritise the investment projects using fuzzy PROMETHEE method
    Tabaraee, Elham
    Ebrahimnejad, Sadoullah
    Bamdad, Shahrooz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 37 (10) : 941 - 955
  • [2] THE FUZZY MODEL FOR THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC INVESTMENT PROJECTS
    Burja, Vasile
    Burja, Camelia
    Aldea, Mihaela
    ECONOMIC WORLD DESTINY: CRISIS AND GLOBALIZATION?, SECTION IV: BANKING, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS FROM THE 21ST CENTURY PERSPECTIVE, 2010, : 144 - 151
  • [3] Risk Evaluation of Investment Projects Based on Fuzzy Theory
    An Ya-Qin
    Wang Ya-Jun
    He Song-Bai
    EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 4289 - 4292
  • [4] Evaluation of Environmental Investment Projects Using a Hybrid Method (SWOT/AHP)
    Stirn, Lidija Zadnik
    KOI 2006: 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 245 - 255
  • [5] Transmission investment evaluation applying fuzzy real options method in uncertain environment
    Dong, Jun
    Chen, Xiao-Liang
    Tian, Kuo
    Zhao, Yong-Liang
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2007, 27 (SUPPL.): : 35 - 39
  • [6] Evaluation of Investment Projects on Distribution Network based on Fuzzy Algorithms
    Liang, Fuguang
    Lv, Xianmin
    Liu, Jinhua
    Zhang, Wenhu
    Liu, Xiaofeng
    Gao, Bingtuan
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER TECHNOLOGY IN AUTOMATION, CONTROL, AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (CYBER), 2015, : 761 - 766
  • [7] Fuzzy overall evaluation of high -tech projects investment risk
    Ma, L
    Han, JX
    Zhang, BF
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 2443 - 2447
  • [8] ESTIMATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REGIONAL INVESTMENT PROJECTS BY FUZZY CONCLUSION METHOD
    Rzaev, Ramin
    Aliev, Elchin
    Akbarov, Rovshan
    Askerov, Nijat
    DECISION MAKING SYSTEMS IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 8 : 37 - 53
  • [9] Research on Investment Environment Performance Evaluation of Blockchain Industry with Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS Method
    Xu, Yong
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING, 2021, 2021
  • [10] Economic evaluation of investment projects using simulation
    Jimenez Boulanger, Francisco
    TECNOLOGIA EN MARCHA, 2006, 19 (01): : 87 - 99