Docetaxel plus S-1 versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer patients: a prospective randomized phase II study

被引:0
作者
Abudureheiyimu, Nilupai [1 ]
Wu, Yun [1 ]
Li, Qing [1 ]
Zhang, Pin [1 ]
Ma, Fei [1 ]
Yuan, Peng [2 ]
Luo, Yang [1 ]
Fan, Ying [1 ]
Chen, Shanshan [1 ]
Cai, Ruigang [1 ]
Li, Qiao [1 ]
Han, Yiqun [1 ]
Xu, Hangcheng [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Jiayu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol,Natl Canc Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Natl Canc Ctr, Dept VIP Med Serv,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER | 2023年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
Advanced breast cancer; Maintenance therapy; Docetaxel; Capecitabine; S-1; CHEMOTHERAPY-NAIVE PATIENTS; TRIAL; COMBINATION; BEVACIZUMAB; OXALIPLATIN; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/S-1 (TS) compared with docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) as a first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer.Methods: Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomly divided into the TS group (n = 54) and the TX group (n = 57) for first-line chemotherapy from August 2015 to April 2019 (ClinicalTrials.org registration no. NCT02947061). Following the completion of combination therapy, patients without progression received S-1 or capecitabine maintenance treatment. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).Results: Among 111 enrolled patients, the median PFS did not differ significantly between the TS group and the TX group (TS vs. TX, 9.0 vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.11, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75). There was also no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between the two groups (TS vs. TX, 40.2 vs. 41.3 months, P = 0.976). In addition, visceral metastasis and metastasis sites, such as the liver or lung, did not lead to a significant effect on PFS and OS. The two regimens showed no significant difference in adverse events, except hand-foot syndrome, which predominated in the TX group (38.6% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.001), and diarrhea (24.1% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.003) and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (14.8% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.049), which were more frequent in the TS group.Conclusions: The TS and TX regimens demonstrated similar efficacy and safety for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. The TS regimen had fewer cases of severe hand-foot syndrome than the TX regimen, representing an effective alternative option to the TX regimen. Further studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety of this strategy in real-world settings.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 120
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Shirasaka T, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P2602
  • [22] Suto A, 2006, ONCOL REP, V15, P1517
  • [23] Taxanes versus S-1 as the first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (SELECT BC): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial
    Takashima, Tsutomu
    Mukai, Hirofumi
    Hara, Fumikata
    Matsubara, Nobuaki
    Saito, Tsuyoshi
    Takano, Toshimi
    Park, Youngjin
    Toyama, Tatsuya
    Hozumi, Yasuo
    Tsurutani, Junji
    Imoto, Shigeru
    Watanabe, Takanori
    Sagara, Yoshiaki
    Nishimura, Reiki
    Shimozuma, Kojiro
    Ohashi, Yasuo
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [24] Capecitabine, Bevacizumab, and Mitomycin in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX Study
    Tebbutt, Niall C.
    Wilson, Kate
    Gebski, Val J.
    Cummins, Michelle M.
    Zannino, Diana
    van Hazel, Guy A.
    Robinson, Bridget
    Broad, Adam
    Ganju, Vinod
    Ackland, Stephen P.
    Forgeson, Garry
    Cunningham, David
    Saunders, Mark P.
    Stockler, Martin R.
    Chua, YuJo
    Zalcberg, John R.
    Simes, R. John
    Price, Timothy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (19) : 3191 - 3198
  • [25] Phase I study of weekly nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Tsurutani, Junji
    Kuroi, Katsumasa
    Iwasa, Tsutomu
    Miyazaki, Masaki
    Nishina, Shinichi
    Makimura, Chihiro
    Tanizaki, Junko
    Okamoto, Kunio
    Yamashita, Toshinari
    Aruga, Tomoyuki
    Shigekawa, Takashi
    Komoike, Yoshifumi
    Saeki, Toshiaki
    Nakagawa, Kazuhiko
    [J]. CANCER SCIENCE, 2015, 106 (06) : 734 - 739
  • [26] EORTC Early Clinical Studies Group early phase II trial of S-I in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer
    Van den Brande, J
    Schöffski, P
    Schellens, JHM
    Roth, AD
    Duffaud, F
    Weigang-Köhler, K
    Reinke, F
    Wanders, J
    de Boer, RF
    Vermorken, JB
    Fumoleau, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 88 (05) : 648 - 653
  • [27] Leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab versus S-1 and oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (SOFT): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial
    Yamada, Yasuhide
    Takahari, Daisuke
    Matsumoto, Hiroshi
    Baba, Hideo
    Nakamura, Masato
    Yoshida, Kazuhiro
    Yoshida, Motoki
    Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi
    Shimada, Ken
    Komatsu, Yoshito
    Sasaki, Yasutsuna
    Satoh, Taroh
    Takahashi, Keiichi
    Mishima, Hideyuki
    Muro, Kei
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Sakata, Yuh
    Morita, Satoshi
    Shimada, Yasuhiro
    Sugihara, Kenichi
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (13) : 1278 - 1286