Understanding cascading risks through real-world interdependent urban infrastructure

被引:18
作者
Brunner, L. G. [1 ]
Peer, R. A. M. [1 ]
Zorn, C. [2 ]
Paulik, R. [3 ]
Logan, T. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Civil & Nat Resources Engn, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Civil & Environm Engn, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Cascading failures; Interdependent infrastructure; Risk analysis; Critical infrastructure; Urban infrastructure; Resilience; Network modeling; RESILIENCE; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; FAILURE; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109653
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The prevalence of cascading failures is growing as infrastructure becomes more interdependent and climate change exacerbates more extreme hazards. After such events, the general focus is on the magnitude of direct damage or loss; it is less understood how events trigger failures throughout other infrastructure. In this work, we present a methodology to model direct and indirect impacts from an event for a multi-system network, including interconnected infrastructure and end users. We perform a case study of New Zealand's second largest city, Christchurch, investigating electricity, water supply, and wastewater networks following a range of coastal flooding events and climate change scenarios. For a 10-year average recurrence interval event given no sea-level rise, there is a 216% increase from directly impacted end users to the total number of end users that have lost at least one utility. For the same scenario, this metric is 71%, 129%, and 131% for end users who have lost electricity, water, and wastewater, respectively. The results show a larger estimate of impact on residents and a more geospatially-varied loss of service. This methodology provides insight for utility operators, emergency response, and communities on node criticality, areas of impact, and resource requirements after an event occurs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability [J].
Adachi, Takao ;
Ellingwood, Bruce R. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (01) :78-88
[2]   Increase in frequency of nuclear power outages due to changing climate [J].
Ahmad, Ali .
NATURE ENERGY, 2021, 6 (07) :755-762
[3]  
Albert-Laszlo B., 2016, Network Science
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Know your hazard risks
[5]   Evolution of the 2010-2012 Canterbury earthquake sequence [J].
Bannister, S. ;
Gledhill, K. .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 55 (03) :295-304
[6]   Probabilistic framework to quantify the seismic resilience of natural gas distribution networks [J].
Baratian, Amin ;
Kashani, Hamed .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2022, 81
[7]   Modeling and vulnerability analysis of interdependent railway and power networks: Application to British test systems [J].
Belle, Andrea ;
Zeng, Zhiguo ;
Duval, Carole ;
Sango, Marc ;
Barros, Anne .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 217
[8]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[9]   Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks [J].
Buldyrev, Sergey V. ;
Parshani, Roni ;
Paul, Gerald ;
Stanley, H. Eugene ;
Havlin, Shlomo .
NATURE, 2010, 464 (7291) :1025-1028
[10]   Cascading risks: Understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas [J].
Busby, Joshua W. ;
Baker, Kyri ;
Bazilian, Morgan D. ;
Gilbert, Alex Q. ;
Grubert, Emily ;
Rai, Varun ;
Rhodes, Joshua D. ;
Shidore, Sarang ;
Smith, Caitlin A. ;
Webber, Michael E. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 77