The peri-implant mucosa color: A systematic appraisal of methods for its assessment and clinical significance

被引:10
作者
Mancini, Leonardo [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Barootchi, Shayan [3 ,5 ]
Thoma, Daniel S. [2 ,6 ]
Jung, Ronald E. [2 ]
Gallucci, German O. [7 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [5 ]
Tavelli, Lorenzo [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Dept Life Hlth & Environm Sci, Laquila, Italy
[2] Univ Zurich, Clin Reconstruct Dent, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Ctr Clin Res & Evidence Synth Oral Tissue Regener, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Med Infect & Immun, Div Periodontol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Res Inst Periodontal Regenerat, Dept Periodontol, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Harvard Sch Dent Med, Dept Restorat Dent & Biomat Sci, Boston, MA USA
关键词
color; dental implants; esthetics; soft tissue; spectrophotometry; systematic review; SINGLE-TOOTH IMPLANTS; GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; POST-EXTRACTIVE IMPLANTS; SOFT-TISSUE COLOR; XENOGENEIC COLLAGEN MATRIX; DELAYED; 6; WEEKS; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ZIRCONIA ABUTMENTS; AESTHETIC ZONE;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13180
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundPeri-implant mucosa color (PMC) seems to be one of the main parameters affecting the esthetic outcome of implant therapy. However, more emphasis should be given to its assessment and reporting. PurposeTo describe the available evidence on methods to assess and report the color of the peri-implant mucosa (PMC) and the respective clinical relevance. Material and MethodsA comprehensive electronic and manual search was performed to identify clinical studies reporting on PMC. ResultsA total of 121 studies were included. PMC was evaluated at the time of the follow-up visit (chairside) in 45.5% studies. PMC assessment was performed qualitatively, by comparing PMC with adjacent and/or contralateral gingiva (78.6%) or quantitatively, using spectrophotometry (20.7%) or a software on clinical photographs (0.8%). The most performed method to assess PMC was through esthetic indices (76.9%), either at the time of the follow-up visit (chairside) or at later time point using photographs. Quantitative reporting of PMC included averages of points from esthetic indices or color differences to natural gingiva expressed with the CIELAB color system. PMC assessment allowed describing color discrepancies compared to natural gingiva, evaluating color changes over time, and comparing the outcomes of different treatment modalities. PMC assessment through spectrophotometry was additionally utilized to assess the role of mucosal thickness (MT) on PMC. ConclusionsVarious methods for PMC assessment and reporting were described, including visual assessment, mainly through esthetic indices, and spectrophotometry. PMC evaluation has allowed to demonstrate the factors affecting the color of the peri-implant soft tissue, such as the type of abutment/restoration, MT, and soft tissue augmentation.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 240
页数:17
相关论文
共 158 条
  • [31] Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics
    Cosyn, Jan
    Eghbali, Aryan
    De Bruyn, Hugo
    Collys, Kristiaan
    Cleymaet, Roberto
    De Rouck, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2011, 38 (08) : 746 - 753
  • [32] Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Cumpston, Miranda
    Li, Tianjing
    Page, Matthew J.
    Chandler, Jacqueline
    Welch, Vivian A.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Thomas, James
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10):
  • [33] Evaluation of Soft Tissues Around Single Tooth Implants in the Anterior Maxilla Restored With Cemented and Screw-Retained Crowns
    Cutrim, Emerson Souza
    Peruzzo, Daiane Cristina
    Benatti, Bruno
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2012, 38 (06) : 700 - 705
  • [34] De Angelis N, 2011, EUR J ORAL IMPLANTOL, V4, P313
  • [35] A randomized controlled study comparing guided bone regeneration with connective tissue graft to re-establish buccal convexity: One-year aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes
    De Bruyckere, Thomas
    Cosyn, Jan
    Younes, Faris
    Hellyn, Jade
    Bekx, Jonas
    Cleymaet, Roberto
    Eghbali, Aryan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (06) : 507 - 516
  • [36] The current use of patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review
    De Bruyn, Hugo
    Raes, Stefanie
    Matthys, Carine
    Cosyn, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 : 45 - 56
  • [37] Validation of 3D documentation of palatal soft tissue shape, color, and irregularity with intraoral scanning
    Deferm, Julie T.
    Schreurs, Ruud
    Baan, Frank
    Bruggink, Robin
    Merkx, Matthijs A. W.
    Xi, Tong
    Berge, Stefaan J.
    Maal, Thomas J. J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (03) : 1303 - 1309
  • [38] Single-Tooth Implants with Different Neck Designs: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Aesthetic Outcome
    den Hartog, Laurens
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Slater, James J. Huddleston
    Stellingsma, Kees
    Vissink, Arjan
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (03) : 311 - 321
  • [39] Immediate provisionalization of bone level implants with a hydrophilic surface. A five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Donos, Nikolaos
    Horvath, Attila
    Calciolari, Elena
    Mardas, Nikos
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (02) : 139 - 149
  • [40] Professional and patient-based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis
    Dueled, Erik
    Gotfredsen, Klaus
    Damsgaard, Mogens Trab
    Hede, Borge
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (07) : 729 - 736