Building consensus in multi-attribute group decision making under a prospect theory-driven feedback adjustment mechanism

被引:8
作者
Liu, Fang [1 ]
Wang, Shi-Shan [1 ]
Zhang, Xin-Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ, Sch Math & Informat Sci, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-attribute group decision making; Prospect theory; Consensus measure; Feedback adjustment mechanism; Optimization model; REPRESENTATION; DISAPPOINTMENT; ASPIRATIONS; FRAMEWORK; REGRET; CHOICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2023.119829
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper reports a prospect theory-based consensus model in multi-attribute group decision making. First, the attribute expectations are regarded as the reference points of decision makers in prospect theory. The attribute values are transformed into the prospect values based on the value function. Then a new consensus measure is proposed to quantify the consensus level. A feedback adjustment mechanism is constructed to improve the consensus level under prospect theory. The convergence of the proposed algorithm is proved. It is found that the proposed mechanism can lessen the work burden of DMs as compared with the existing methods. Finally, the weights of attributes are computed by constructing an optimization model that maximizes the sum of prospect values. Case study and comparative analysis are offered to illustrate the novelty and advantage of the proposed model. The obtained results reveal that an increasing loss aversion enhances the difficulty of reaching consensus.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[2]   MADM method based on prospect theory and evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights under intuitionistic fuzzy environment [J].
Bao, Tiantian ;
Xie, Xinlian ;
Long, Peiyin ;
Wei, Zhaokun .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 88 :305-317
[3]   DISAPPOINTMENT IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1985, 33 (01) :1-27
[4]   REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) :961-981
[5]   Additive Utility in Prospect Theory [J].
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Schmidt, Ulrich ;
Zank, Horst .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (05) :863-873
[6]   Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks [J].
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Moreno, J. M. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 14 (05) :451-463
[7]  
Camerer C., 1998, Experimental Economics, V1, P163
[8]  
Camerer C. F., 1989, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, V2, P61, DOI [10.1007/BF00055711, DOI 10.1007/BF00055711]
[9]   Multistage Decision Framework for the Selection of Renewable Energy Sources Based on Prospect Theory and PROMETHEE [J].
Chen, Ting ;
Wang, Yi-ting ;
Wang, Jian-qiang ;
Li, Lin ;
Cheng, Peng-Fei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 22 (05) :1535-1551
[10]   Consensus building in multiperson decision making with heterogeneous preference representation structures: A perspective based on prospect theory [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Luo, Nan ;
Liang, Haiming .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 35 :898-910