A radiomics-based interpretable model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:22
作者
Ye, Jing-Yuan [1 ]
Fang, Peng [1 ]
Peng, Zhen-Peng [2 ]
Huang, Xi-Tai [1 ]
Xie, Jin-Zhao [1 ]
Yin, Xiao-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pancreatobiliary Surg, 58 Zhongshan Er Rd, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiol, 58 Zhongshan Er Rd, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Radiomics; Machine learning; Interpretability; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; Pathological grade; KI67 LABELING INDEX; HETEROGENEITY; SURVIVAL; DIAGNOSIS; CRITERIA; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10186-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To develop a computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in a non-invasive manner. Methods Patients with pNETs who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT between 2010 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Radiomics features were extracted, and five radiomics-based ML models, namely logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, and GaussianNB, were developed. The performance of these models was evaluated using a time-independent testing set, and metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. The accuracy of the radiomics model was compared to that of needle biopsy. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) tool and the correlation between radiomics and biological features were employed to explore the interpretability of the model. Results A total of 122 patients (mean age: 50 +/- 14 years; 53 male) were included in the training set, whereas 100 patients (mean age: 48 +/- 13 years; 50 male) were included in the testing set. The AUCs for LR, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and GaussianNB were 0.758, 0.742, 0.779, 0.744, and 0.745, respectively, with corresponding accuracies of 73.0%, 70.0%, 77.0%, 71.9%, and 72.9%. The SHAP tool identified two features of the venous phase as the most significant, which showed significant differences among the Ki-67 index or mitotic count subgroups (p < 0.001). Conclusions An interpretable radiomics- based RF model can effectively differentiate between G1 and G2/3 of pNETs, demonstrating favorable interpretability. Clinical relevance statement The radiomics-based interpretable model developed in this study has significant clinical relevance as it offers a non-invasive method for assessing the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and holds promise as an important complementary tool to traditional tissue biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1994 / 2005
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine
    Lambin, Philippe
    Leijenaar, Ralph T. H.
    Deist, Timo M.
    Peerlings, Jurgen
    de Jong, Evelyn E. C.
    van Timmeren, Janita
    Sanduleanu, Sebastian
    Larue, Ruben T. H. M.
    Even, Aniek J. G.
    Jochems, Arthur
    van Wijk, Yvonka
    Woodruff, Henry
    van Soest, Johan
    Lustberg, Tim
    Roelofs, Erik
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    Dekker, Andre
    Mottaghy, Felix M.
    Wildberger, Joachim E.
    Walsh, Sean
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 14 (12) : 749 - 762
  • [22] A Combined Nomogram Model to Preoperatively Predict Histologic Grade in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Liang, Wenjie
    Yang, Pengfei
    Huang, Rui
    Xu, Lei
    Wang, Jiawei
    Liu, Weihai
    Zhang, Lele
    Wan, Dalong
    Huang, Qiang
    Lu, Yao
    Kuang, Yu
    Niu, Tianye
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (02) : 584 - 594
  • [23] Liszka L, 2016, POL J PATHOL, V67, P318, DOI [10.5114/PJP.2016.65864, 10.5114/pjp.2016.65864]
  • [24] Introduction to Radiomics
    Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
    Materka, Andrzej
    Langs, Georg
    Haggstrom, Ida
    Szczypinski, Piotr
    Gibbs, Peter
    Cook, Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (04) : 488 - 495
  • [25] The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system
    Nagtegaal, Iris D.
    Odze, Robert D.
    Klimstra, David
    Paradis, Valerie
    Rugge, Massimo
    Schirmacher, Peter
    Washington, Kay M.
    Carneiro, Fatima
    Cree, Ian A.
    [J]. HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 76 (02) : 182 - 188
  • [26] Neuroendocrine bronchial and thymic tumors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
    Oberg, K.
    Hellman, P.
    Ferolla, P.
    Papotti, M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 120 - 123
  • [27] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases
    Paiella, Salvatore
    Landoni, Luca
    Rota, Roberta
    Valenti, Matteo
    Elio, Giovanni
    Crino, Stefano Francesco
    Manfrin, Erminia
    Parisi, Alice
    Cingarlini, Sara
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    Scarpa, Aldo
    Lawlor, Rita Teresa
    Bernardoni, Laura
    Capelli, Paola
    Nessi, Chiara
    Miotto, Marco
    Gabbrielli, Armando
    Bassi, Claudio
    Salvia, Roberto
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 52 (11) : 988 - 994
  • [28] Feature selection based on mutual information: Criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy
    Peng, HC
    Long, FH
    Ding, C
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2005, 27 (08) : 1226 - 1238
  • [29] Opening the Black Box: The Promise and Limitations of Explainable Machine Learning in Cardiology
    Petch, Jeremy
    Di, Shuang
    Nelson, Walter
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 38 (02) : 204 - 213
  • [30] New frontiers in imaging including radiomics updates for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Saleh, Mohammed
    Bhosale, Priya R.
    Yano, Motoyo
    Itani, Malak
    Elsayes, Ahmed K.
    Halperin, Daniel
    Bergsland, Emily K.
    Morani, Ajaykumar C.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (09) : 3078 - 3100