Why to gamify performance management? Consequences of user engagement in gamification

被引:18
作者
Bizzi, Lorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ, Dept Management, 800 North State Coll Blvd, Fullerton, CA 92381 USA
关键词
Gamification; Performance management; Employee attitudes; Performance; PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT; JOB-SATISFACTION; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; EMPLOYEE REACTIONS; APPRAISAL PROCESS; JUSTICE; COMMITMENT; CHALLENGE; OUTCOMES; CITIZENSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2023.103762
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Gamification offers one of the most promising solutions for information technology (IT) managers to innovate performance management systems. Yet, evidence on its benefits is limited, and IT managers are left without a clear guidance on why to implement it. To solve the problem, this article shows the benefits of gamification for overall job performance and the intermediating mechanisms through which it exercises its advantageous effects. It is theorized that employees' engagement in gamification favorably alters their cognitions, transferring their effect onto employee attitudes and behaviors in the workplace. First, user engagement in gamification alters cognitions about the performance management system, making employees perceive justice, which, in turn, af-fects their satisfaction with the performance system. Second, user engagement in gamification alters cognitions about the job, influencing the perceptions of job stressors that affect job satisfaction. Third, user engagement in gamification alters cognitions about the organization, making employees perceive organizational support, which translates into higher organizational commitment. The improved cognitions then transfer their beneficial effect onto overall job performance as justice is found to exercise a mediating effect. The findings from 268 employees in a human resource service organization support the hypotheses and provide concrete evidence for the benefits of gamification in performance management.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
  • [21] Deloitte Review, 2012, ENG EC GAM IS RESH B
  • [22] EISENBERGER R, 1986, J APPL PSYCHOL, V71, P500, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  • [23] Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction
    Eisenberger, R
    Cummings, J
    Armeli, S
    Lynch, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (05) : 812 - 820
  • [24] Performance appraisal process and system facets: Relationships with contextual performance
    Findley, HM
    Giles, WF
    Mossholder, KW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (04) : 634 - 640
  • [25] Too Good to Hire? Capability and Inferences about Commitment in Labor Markets*
    Galperin, Roman, V
    Hahl, Oliver
    Sterling, Adina D.
    Guo, Jerry
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2020, 65 (02) : 275 - 313
  • [26] Work gamification: Effects on enjoyment, productivity and the role of leadership
    Gerdenitsch, Cornelia
    Sellitsch, David
    Besser, Markus
    Burger, Sophia
    Stegmann, Christine
    Tscheligi, Manfred
    Kriglstein, Simone
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 43
  • [27] EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO CONTEXTUAL AND SESSION COMPONENTS OF PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL
    GILES, WF
    MOSSHOLDER, KW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04) : 371 - 377
  • [28] Procedural fairness in performance appraisal: Beyond the review session
    Giles, WF
    Findley, HM
    Feild, HS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 11 (04) : 493 - 506
  • [29] Performance management and employee engagement
    Gruman, Jamie A.
    Saks, Alan M.
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 21 (02) : 123 - 136
  • [30] Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification
    Hamari, Juho
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 71 : 469 - 478