Fostering student motivation and engagement with feedback through ipsative processes

被引:15
作者
Malecka, Bianka [1 ]
Boud, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Middlesex Univ, Work & Learning Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
Feedback; ipsative processes; learner-centredness; motivation; programmatic assessment; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; WRITTEN FEEDBACK; SELF-ASSESSMENT; LEARNERS;
D O I
10.1080/13562517.2021.1928061
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recent feedback literature emphasises the active role of learners in feedback processes and a programmatic approach to feedback design. This conceptual paper argues for the importance of ipsative processes, i.e. processes focusing on learners' progress as a mechanism in meeting these two requirements. It suggests that the iterative nature of ipsative processes can encourage effective, learner-centred feedback and its implementation across multiple tasks can promote the uptake of feedback in subsequent work. Using self-determination theory, the paper discusses how ipsative feedback processes create conditions which can foster students' perceptions of autonomy, competence and relatedness, thus fostering student motivation to engage with feedback. The implementation of ipsative processes is illustrated with references to two pedagogic practices. The paper identifies the need for further empirical research investigating academic and noncognitive benefits of ipsative processes in feedback for students as well as autoethnographic work examining the implications of implementing ipsative processes for teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:1761 / 1776
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[41]   Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being [J].
Ryan, RM ;
Deci, EL .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 55 (01) :68-78
[42]   Feeling feedback: students' emotional responses to educator feedback [J].
Ryan, Tracii ;
Henderson, Michael .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (06) :880-892
[43]   Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement [J].
Sadler, D. Royce .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (07) :807-826
[44]   FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT AND THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTIONAL-SYSTEMS [J].
SADLER, DR .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1989, 18 (02) :119-144
[45]   Integrating learners into the assessment process using adaptive comparative judgement with an ipsative approach to identifying competence based gains relative to student ability levels [J].
Seery, Niall ;
Buckley, Jeffrey ;
Delahunty, Thomas ;
Canty, Donal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2019, 29 (04) :701-715
[46]   Focus on formative feedback [J].
Shute, Valerie J. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2008, 78 (01) :153-189
[47]   Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback? [J].
Sinclair, Hazel K. ;
Cleland, Jennifer A. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (06) :580-582
[48]   To do or not to do with feedback. A study of undergraduate students' engagement and use of feedback within a portfolio assessment design [J].
Steen-Utheim, Anna ;
Hopfenbeck, Therese N. .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (01) :80-96
[49]   Developing evaluative judgement: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work [J].
Tai, Joanna ;
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Boud, David ;
Dawson, Phillip ;
Panadero, Ernesto .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 76 (03) :467-481
[50]   The "Educational Alliance" as a Framework for Reconceptualizing Feedback in Medical Education [J].
Telio, Summer ;
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Regehr, Glenn .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (05) :609-614