Fostering student motivation and engagement with feedback through ipsative processes

被引:15
作者
Malecka, Bianka [1 ]
Boud, David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Middlesex Univ, Work & Learning Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
Feedback; ipsative processes; learner-centredness; motivation; programmatic assessment; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; WRITTEN FEEDBACK; SELF-ASSESSMENT; LEARNERS;
D O I
10.1080/13562517.2021.1928061
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recent feedback literature emphasises the active role of learners in feedback processes and a programmatic approach to feedback design. This conceptual paper argues for the importance of ipsative processes, i.e. processes focusing on learners' progress as a mechanism in meeting these two requirements. It suggests that the iterative nature of ipsative processes can encourage effective, learner-centred feedback and its implementation across multiple tasks can promote the uptake of feedback in subsequent work. Using self-determination theory, the paper discusses how ipsative feedback processes create conditions which can foster students' perceptions of autonomy, competence and relatedness, thus fostering student motivation to engage with feedback. The implementation of ipsative processes is illustrated with references to two pedagogic practices. The paper identifies the need for further empirical research investigating academic and noncognitive benefits of ipsative processes in feedback for students as well as autoethnographic work examining the implications of implementing ipsative processes for teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:1761 / 1776
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Ajjawi R., 2018, Developing evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and producing quality work, P41
[2]   Feedback that works: a realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks [J].
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Kent, Fiona ;
Broadbent, Jaclyn ;
Tai, Joanna Hong-Meng ;
Bearman, Margaret ;
Boud, David .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (07) :1343-1356
[3]   Enhancing written feedback: The use of a cover sheet influences feedback quality [J].
Arts, J. G. ;
Jaspers, M. ;
Joosten-ten Brinke, D. .
COGENT EDUCATION, 2021, 8 (01)
[4]  
Askew S., 2004, Feedback for learning, P13
[5]   Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning? [J].
Beaumont, Chris ;
O'Doherty, Michelle ;
Shannon, Lee .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (06) :671-687
[6]  
Boud D, 2017, ENABLING POWER ASSES, V5, P19, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_2
[7]   Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? [J].
Boud, David ;
Lawson, Romy ;
Thompson, Darrall G. .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (08) :941-956
[8]   Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design [J].
Boud, David ;
Molloy, Elizabeth .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (06) :698-712
[9]  
Buckley, 2017, ILLUSTRATING ED DEV
[10]  
Carless D., 2015, Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-Winning Practice