Evaluation of Non-Contact Device to Measure Body Temperature in Sheep

Simple Summary Rectal thermometry is still standard practice in the measurement of body temperature in livestock because of its low cost. However, there are situations where this method is contraindicated or impractical, and a less invasive method is required. Non-contact devices have been used in livestock production; however, there are few studies about the variation and correlations in body temperature between rectal temperature and non-contact devices. The present work aims to compare rectal temperature with two types of non-contact devices (non-contact infrared thermometers and thermal imaging/infrared thermography) for the assessment of body temperature in healthy sheep. Except for the temperature taken by non-contact infrared thermometers at the muzzle, the correlation between rectal temperature vs. non-contact infrared thermometers or thermal imaging/infrared thermography showed a low significance or was difficult to use for practical flock management purposes. In addition, the variability between devices was high, which implies that measurements should be interpreted with caution in warm climates and open pens, such as most sheep farms in the Spanish Mediterranean area.Abstract Non-contact devices have been used in the measurement of body temperature in livestock production as a tool for testing disease in different species. However, there are few studies about the variation and correlations in body temperature between rectal temperature (RT) and non-contact devices such as non-contact infrared thermometers (NCIT) and thermal imaging/infrared thermography (IRT). The objective of this work was to evaluate the accuracy of non-contact devices to measure the body temperature in sheep, considering six body regions and the possibility of implementing these systems in herd management. The experiment was carried out at the experimental farm of the Catholic University of Valencia, located in the municipality of Massanassa in July of 2021, with 72 dry manchega ewes, and we compared the rectal temperature with two types of non-contact infrared devices for the assessment of body temperature in healthy sheep. Except for the temperature taken by NCIT at the muzzle, the correlation between RT vs. NCIT or IRT showed a low significance or was difficult to use for practical flock management purposes. In addition, the variability between devices was high, which implies that measurements should be interpreted with caution in warm climates and open pens, such as most sheep farms in the Spanish Mediterranean area. The use of infrared cameras devices to assess body temperature may have a promising future, but in order to be widely applied as a routine management method on farms, the system needs to become cheaper, simpler in terms of measurements and quicker in terms of analyzing results.