Political economy of low-carbon electricity: Governance effects across 198 countries

被引:0
作者
Evensen, Darrick [1 ,2 ]
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Inst Global Sustainabil, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Polit & Int Relat, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Boston Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Sussex, Business Sch, Sci Policy Res Unit SPRU, Brighton, England
[5] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Energy Technol, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Governance; Low-carbon; Renewables; Cross-national; Global; Energy; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; RESOURCE CURSE; HYDROPOWER; POWER; SECURITY; SUSTAINABILITY; RESETTLEMENT; CONFLICT; SCIENCE; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2023.114016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Which countries best foster low-carbon electricity transitions - authoritarian regimes or democratic societies? Crucial for understanding how transitions unfold is identifying contextual factors conditioning propensity to adopt specific forms of energy production. This research assesses the relationship between quality of governance within 198 countries and domestic electricity production from all major energy sources, across the years 2002-2020. Governance quality is measured via a range of comprehensive, internationally recognised metrics, focusing predominantly on the World Bank's worldwide governance indicators. The data reveal that a future, decarbonised electricity system via wind, solar, and/or nuclear appears most likely in countries where the traditions and institutions by which authority is exercised support good governance. Over the last two decades, the association between electricity from solar and wind and good governance has progressively strengthened globally. Beyond governance, national measures of economic (in)equality are strongly related to electricity production from nuclear and hydropower. These findings offer a point of departure for assessing how governance systems might predispose countries to particular energy choices.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[2]   The Nexus Between Worldwide Governance Indicators and Hydropower Sustainable Growth in EU 28 Region [J].
Alsaleh, Mohd ;
Abdul-Rahim, A. S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (06) :1001-1015
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Worldwide Governance Indicators
[5]   Tensions in the transition: The politics of electricity distribution in South Africa [J].
Baker, Lucy ;
Phillips, Jon .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2019, 37 (01) :177-196
[6]   The Political Economy of Energy Transitions: The Case of South Africa [J].
Baker, Lucy ;
Newell, Peter ;
Phillips, Jon .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2014, 19 (06) :791-818
[7]   Vetoing the future: political constraints and renewable energy [J].
Bayulgen, Oksan ;
Ladewig, Jeffrey W. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2017, 26 (01) :49-70
[8]   Creating space for wind energy in a polycentric governance setting [J].
Biehl, J. ;
Koeppel, J. ;
Grimm, M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 152
[9]   Energy security and Russia's gas strategy: The symbiotic relationship between the state and firms [J].
Bilgin, Mert .
COMMUNIST AND POST-COMMUNIST STUDIES, 2011, 44 (02) :119-127
[10]   Moving beyond coal: Exploring and explaining the Powering Past Coal Alliance [J].
Blondeel, Mathieu ;
Van de Graaf, Thijs ;
Haesebrouck, Tim .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 59