Climate change impact of food distribution: The case of reverse logistics for bread in Sweden

被引:8
作者
Weber, L. [1 ]
Bartek, L. [1 ]
Brancoli, P. [2 ]
Sjoelund, A. [1 ]
Eriksson, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Energy & Technol, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Boras, Dept Resource Recovery & Bldg Technol, Boras, Sweden
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Resource recovery; Transport emissions; Valorization; Food transport; Take-back agreement; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; WASTE PREVENTION; CONSUMPTION; MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS; SURPLUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Efficient and purposeful transport of food, from primary production to waste management, is essential to drive the necessary transition towards sustainable production and consumption of food within planetary boundaries. This is particularly the case for bread, one of the most frequently wasted food items in Europe. In Sweden, bread is often sold under a take-back agreement where bakeries are responsible for transportation up to the supermarket shelf and for the collection of unsold products. This provides an opportunity for reverse logistics, but creates a risk of inefficient transport that could reduce the environmental benefits of prevention and valorization of surplus bread. This study assessed the climate change impact of bread transport in Sweden and evaluated the impact of alternative food transport pathways. Life cycle assessment revealed the climate change impact of conventional bread transport, from bakery gate to waste management, to be on average 49.0 g CO2e per kg bread with 68 % deriving from long-distance transport, 26 % from short-distance delivery, and 6 % from waste transport. Evalua-tion of alternative bread transport pathways showed the highest climate savings with a collaborative transport approach that also reduced the need for small vehicles and decreased transport distances. The overall contribu-tion of waste transport to the total climate impact of food transport was low for all scenario routes analyzed, sug-gesting that food waste management facilitating high-value recovery and valorization could be prioritized without increasing the climate impact due to longer transport. It has been claimed that conventional take-back agreements are responsible for most of the climate change impact related to bread transport, but we identified long distances between bakeries and retailers as the main contributor to transport climate impacts.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 396
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Factors affecting the emission of pollutants in different types of transportation: A literature review
    Aminzadegan, Sajede
    Shahriari, Mohsen
    Mehranfar, Fahime
    Abramovic, Borna
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 2508 - 2529
  • [2] Angervall T., 2011, FORENKLAD METOD KLIM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction food and agriculture (First Edit)
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, FOOD WASTE INDEX REP
  • [6] Environmental benefits of circular food systems: The case of upcycled protein recovered using genome edited potato
    Bartek, L.
    Sundin, N.
    Strid, I.
    Andersson, M.
    Hansson, P-A.
    Eriksson, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 380
  • [7] Sustainability Assessment of Food Redistribution Initiatives in Sweden
    Bergstrom, Pauline
    Malefors, Christopher
    Strid, Ingrid
    Hanssen, Ole Jorgen
    Eriksson, Mattias
    [J]. RESOURCES-BASEL, 2020, 9 (03):
  • [8] Bernstein S, 2017, EARTH SYST GOV, P213
  • [9] Bos-Brouwers H., 2023, POLICY RECOMMENDATIO
  • [10] Economic and environmental assessment of different reverse logistics scenarios for food waste recovery
    Bottani, Eleonora
    Vignali, Giuseppe
    Mosna, David
    Montanari, Roberto
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2019, 20 : 289 - 303