Industrial Carbon Footprint (ICF) Calculation Approach Based on Bayesian Cross-Validation Improved Cyclic Stacking

被引:0
作者
Xie, Yichao [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Bowen [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhenyu [3 ]
Yang, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Ning, Liaoyi [4 ]
Zhang, Yanhui [5 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Key Lab Integrated Energy Optimizat & Secure Opera, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[3] State Grid Elect Power Res Inst Wuhan Efficiency E, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[4] Panjin Elect Power Supply Co, State Grid Liaoning Elect Power Supply Co Ltd, Panjin 124010, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, Shenzhen Inst Adv Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
关键词
industrial carbon footprint; cyclic stacking; appliance identification; state correction; cross-validation; EMISSION;
D O I
10.3390/su151914357
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Achieving carbon neutrality is widely regarded as a key measure to mitigate climate change. The industrial carbon footprint (ICF) calculation, as a foundation to achieve carbon neutrality, primarily relies on roughly estimating direct carbon emissions based on information disclosed by industries. However, these estimates may not be comprehensive, timely, and accurate. This paper elaborates on the issue of ICF calculation, dividing a factory's carbon emissions into carbon emissions directly produced by appliances and electricity consumption carbon emissions, to estimate the total carbon emissions of the factory. An appliance identification method is proposed based on a cyclic stacking method improved by Bayesian cross-validation, and an appliance state correction module SHMM (state-corrected hidden Markov model) is added to identify the state of the appliance and then to calculate the corresponding appliance carbon emissions. Electricity consumption carbon emissions come from the factory's electricity consumption and the marginal carbon emission factor of the connected bus. Regarding the selection of artificial intelligence models and cross-validation technique required in the appliance identification method, this paper compares the effects of 7 cross-validation techniques, including stratified K-fold, K-fold, Monte Carlo, etc., on 14 machine learning algorithms such as AdaBoost, XGBoost, feed-forward network, etc., to determine the technique and algorithms required for the final appliance identification method. Experiment results show that the proposed appliance identification method estimates device carbon emissions with an error of less than 3%, which is significantly superior to other models, demonstrating that the proposed approach can achieve comprehensive and accurate ICF calculation.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Predicting the Environmental Change of Carbon Emission Patterns in South Asia: A Deep Learning Approach Using BiLSTM
    Aamir, Muhammad
    Bhatti, Mughair Aslam
    Bazai, Sibghat Ullah
    Marjan, Shah
    Mirza, Aamir Mehmood
    Wahid, Abdul
    Hasnain, Ahmad
    Bhatti, Uzair Aslam
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (12)
  • [2] One-class support vector classifiers: A survey
    Alam, Shamshe
    Sonbhadra, Sanjay Kumar
    Agarwal, Sonali
    Nagabhushan, P.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2020, 196
  • [3] Human-Computer Interaction for Recognizing Speech Emotions Using Multilayer Perceptron Classifier
    Alnuaim, Abeer Ali
    Zakariah, Mohammed
    Shukla, Prashant Kumar
    Alhadlaq, Aseel
    Hatamleh, Wesam Atef
    Tarazi, Hussam
    Sureshbabu, R.
    Ratna, Rajnish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [4] NILM applications: Literature review of learning approaches, recent developments and challenges
    Angelis, Georgios-Fotios
    Timplalexis, Christos
    Krinidis, Stelios
    Ioannidis, Dimosthenis
    Tzovaras, Dimitrios
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 261
  • [5] Babaeinejadsarookolaee S, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1908.02788
  • [6] Electricity production based forecasting of greenhouse gas emissions in Turkey with deep learning, support vector machine and artificial neural network algorithms
    Bakay, Melahat Sevgul
    Agbulut, Umit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 285
  • [7] Bejarano G, 2019, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P850
  • [8] Interpretable Machine Learning-Tools to Interpret the Predictions of a Machine Learning Model Predicting the Electrical Energy Consumption of an Electric Arc Furnace
    Carlsson, Leo Stefan
    Samuelsson, Peter Bengt
    Jonsson, Par Goran
    [J]. STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 91 (11)
  • [9] Modeling industrial hydrocyclone operational variables by SHAP-CatBoost - A "conscious lab" approach
    Chelgani, S. Chehreh
    Nasiri, H.
    Tohry, A.
    Heidari, H. R.
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 420
  • [10] Improved naive Bayes classification algorithm for traffic risk management
    Chen, Hong
    Hu, Songhua
    Hua, Rui
    Zhao, Xiuju
    [J]. EURASIP JOURNAL ON ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 2021 (01)