Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and Balanced Scorecard for Kaizen Evaluation

被引:1
作者
El Dardery, Ola I. S. [1 ]
Gomaa, Ismail [1 ,2 ]
Rayan, Adel R. M. [1 ]
Frendy [3 ]
Khayat, Ghada El [2 ]
Sabry, Sara H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Egypt Japan Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Int Business & Humanities, Sch Int Business, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Alexandria Univ, Fac Commerce, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] NUCB, Grad Sch Management, Business Sch, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
来源
BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL | 2023年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Balanced Scorecard; Continuous improvement; Evaluation; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Kaizen; Performance measurement; Q56; M41; H83; PERFORMANCE; EVENTS;
D O I
10.2478/bsrj-2023-0006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background Kaizen is a very important continuous improvement technique; however, measuring kaizen results/benefits have not been clearly and comprehensively addressed by the literature.Objectives This paper aims to propose a kaizen measuring system by integrating a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and a Fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy TOPSIS).Methods/Approach Three research instruments were distributed to kaizen experts to allocate kaizen benefits into the four BSC perspectives. The best measures of kaizen benefits were determined by employing the Fuzzy TOPSIS technique.Results The results present a kaizen performance evaluation system where the benefits were allocated into the four BSC perspectives, and the best measure for each kaizen benefit was chosen using fuzzy TOPSIS.Conclusions The research contributes to the literature by proposing a kaizen measurement system that will pair each benefit of using kaizen with BSC perspectives and measures, thus expanding the advantages of adopting kaizen to any sector or industry.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 130
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-TOPSIS framework for prioritizing emergency in a petrochemical industry [J].
Abbassinia, Marzieh ;
Kalatpour, Omid ;
Motamedzade, Majid ;
Soltanian, Ali Reza ;
Mohammadfam, Iraj .
ARCHIVES OF TRAUMA RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (01) :35-40
[2]  
Adams M., 1999, SAE transactions, P1092, DOI [10.4271/1999-01-3362, DOI 10.4271/1999-01-3362]
[3]  
Arif-Uz-Zaman K., 2012, Doctoral dissertation
[4]   A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Goyal, S. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 126 (02) :370-378
[5]  
Bartel P., 2011, Kaizen in outpatient services at Kishwaukee Community Hospital
[6]  
BARTLETT MS, 1954, J ROY STAT SOC B, V16, P296
[7]   Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement [J].
Bremser, WG ;
Barsky, NP .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2004, 34 (03) :229-238
[8]  
Chandrahas SKM., 2014, J MAT SCI MECH ENG J, V1, P89
[9]   Kaizen events and organizational performance: a field study [J].
Doolen, Toni L. ;
Van Aken, Eileen M. ;
Farris, Jennifer A. ;
Worley, June M. ;
Huwe, Jeremy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 57 (08) :637-+
[10]  
El Dardery O.I., 2021, International journal of economics and management engineering, V15, P917