A computational sustainable approach for energy storage systems performance evaluation based on spherical-fuzzy MCDM with considering uncertainty

被引:13
作者
Gamal, Abduallah [1 ]
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed [1 ]
Hezam, Ibrahim M. [2 ]
Sallam, Karam M. [3 ,4 ]
Alshamrani, Ahmad M. [2 ]
Hameed, Ibrahim A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Zagazig Univ, Fac Comp & Informat, Zagazig 44519, Sharqiyah, Egypt
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Stat & Operat Res Dept, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Sharjah, Dept Comp Sci, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[4] Univ Canberra, Fac Sci & Technol, Sch IT & Syst, Canberra, Australia
[5] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept ICT & Nat Sci, Alesund, Norway
关键词
Energy storage systems; Sustainable; Uncertainty; MCDM; SF-AHP; SF-MACONT; Sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2023.12.058
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Incorporating energy storage systems (ESSs) can mitigate the intermittency of renewable energy sources. There are a variety of ESSs for renewable energy with vastly different characteristics. The problem of diversity of characteristics in selecting the most appropriate ESS can be approached as a multi -criteria decision -making (MCDM) problem. This research evaluates sustainable ESSs through a case study in Egypt. A sustainable computational approach is presented through which experts can use verbal expressions to express their opinions in determining the priorities of the dimensions that affect the selection of ESSs. Determining the appropriate energy storage system requires consideration of several main dimensions such as the technology dimension, environmental dimension, economic dimension, and social -political dimension and, in addition to the subindicators. Hence, this research applies a hybrid MCDM approach that deals with different indicators and characteristics. Also, uncertainty in applying the proposed approach was dealt with by a spherical fuzzy (SF) environment and by using the spherical fuzzy numbers (SFNs). At first, the SF analytical hierarchy process (SFAHP) method was used to assess the priorities of the four main dimensions and their sub -indicators. Then, the SF mixed aggregation by comprehensive normalization technique (SF-MACONT) was applied to evaluate and rank the ESSs selected for analysis through research. An illustrative case study was presented that included seven ESSs out of the eighteen systems listed in the research to confirm the feasibility of the developed approach. Sensitivity analysis was carried out by changing some parameters like lambda, mu, delta, and & thetasym; based on the SF-MACONT method and changing the weights of some main dimensions. A comparative analysis with some MCDM approaches was conducted to show the advantages of the developed approach through its flexibility and built-in parameters. The findings show that the technology dimension is the most influential in choosing a sustainable ESS, while the economic dimension is the least influential. Also, the results of the evaluation and ranking of the seven selected ESSs indicate that the "Pumped Hydro" system is the most suitable system for energy storage in Egypt.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1341
页数:23
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology [J].
Abdul, Daud ;
Jiang, Wenqi ;
Tanveer, Arsalan .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 184 :1018-1032
[2]   Investigating the components of fintech ecosystem for distributed energy investments with an integrated quantum spherical decision support system [J].
Ai, Rui ;
Zheng, Yuhang ;
Yuksel, Serhat ;
Dincer, Hasan .
FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2023, 9 (01)
[3]   A New Hybrid MCDM Model for Insulation Material Evaluation for Healthier Environment [J].
Aksakal, Berrak ;
Ulutas, Alptekin ;
Balo, Figen ;
Karabasevic, Darjan .
BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (05)
[4]   Sustainability Performance Index for Ranking Energy Storage Technologies using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model and Hybrid Computational Method [J].
Albawab, Mona ;
Ghenai, Chaouki ;
Bettayeb, Maamar ;
Janajreh, Isam .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 32
[5]   Computational Study of Security Risk Evaluation in Energy Management and Control Systems Based on a Fuzzy MCDM Method [J].
Alhakami, Wajdi .
PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (05)
[6]   A comprehensive literature review on the challenges associated with underground hydrogen storage [J].
Bin Navaid, Humza ;
Emadi, Hossein ;
Watson, Marshall .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (28) :10603-10635
[7]   The path towards sustainable energy [J].
Chu, Steven ;
Cui, Yi ;
Liu, Nian .
NATURE MATERIALS, 2017, 16 (01) :16-22
[8]   Multi-criteria evaluation of energy storage technologies based on hesitant fuzzy information: A case study for Turkey [J].
Colak, Murat ;
Kayab, Ihsan .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 28
[9]   Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method [J].
Gundogdu, Fatma Kutlu ;
Kahraman, Cengiz .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (01) :337-352
[10]   Mainstreaming graphene in electrochemical energy storage devices: A Delphi-based adaptive priority-setting [J].
Haidar, Ali ;
Guimon, Jose ;
Martinez, Javier Perez .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 71 :279-290