Living with wildlife: a review of advances in social-ecological analysis across landscapes

被引:6
作者
Hull, Vanessa [1 ]
Bian, Xiaoxing [1 ,2 ]
Episcopio-Sturgeon, Diane J. [1 ,2 ]
Rivera, Christian J. [3 ]
Rojas-Bonzi, Viviana [1 ,4 ]
Morzillo, Anita T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, 110 Newins Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, 2035 McCarty Hall D,POB 116455, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, High Meadows Environm Inst, M31 Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[4] IIBP, 1607 Escudo, Asuncion 1425, Paraguay
[5] Univ Connecticut, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, 1376 Storrs Rd,Unit 4087, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
Co-existence; Coupled human and natural systems; Human-wildlife interactions; Social-ecological systems; SPATIAL OVERLAP; ATTITUDES; MODEL; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAGMENTATION; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION; UNDERSTAND; CONFLICTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-023-01778-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
ContextAn exciting research frontier is the intersection of wildlife ecology and social science. Associated research is embracing a spatial approach to integrating ecological and social data to investigate the complex relationships between wildlife and humans across landscapes. However, there is a lack of coherence on the status, current methodology, and potential future directions of this body of research to advance landscape analyses.ObjectivesWe provided a review of the current state of the science of social-ecological research and modeling of human-wildlife interactions across space, with a goal of compiling state-of-the-art approaches, methods, major findings, limitations, and future directions.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed journal articles published from January 2000 to August 2023. We synthesized methods, lessons learned, and key themes in the literature.ResultsSynthesized findings pointed to the importance of spatial context in shaping wildlife and human attributes and their interactions, and the demonstrated value of adding social science data to contest past practices of oversimplifying the complex drivers of human-wildlife interactions. Challenges and limitations included spatial scale mismatches, the limits of assigning causality, misaligned terminology, and need for more in-depth and diverse social science data collection methods and frameworks.ConclusionsThese studies highlighted the potential for social-ecological analyses to inform management through identification of key levers, scenario modeling, and avoidance of "panacea traps." Our results also chart a path forward that calls for more extensive data integration, investigation of feedbacks, and multi-scale approaches to more deeply understand human-wildlife relationships across landscapes.
引用
收藏
页码:4385 / 4402
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Responding to adolescents living with HIV in Zambia: A social-ecological approach
    Mburu, Gitau
    Ram, Mala
    Oxenham, Danielle
    Haamujompa, Choolwe
    Iorpenda, Kate
    Ferguson, Laura
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2014, 45 : 9 - 17
  • [32] A social-ecological approach to local forest conflict analysis and shaping
    Brietzke, Anna S.
    Schramm, Engelbert
    Heb, Katharina
    Hummel, Diana
    Kress-Ludwig, Michael
    Luedtke, Deike U.
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2025, 172
  • [33] Human-nature relationships: An introduction to social-ecological practice theory for human-wildlife interactions
    Orrick, Kaggie
    Dove, Michael
    Schmitz, Oswald J.
    AMBIO, 2024, 53 (02) : 201 - 211
  • [34] The meaning(s) of place: Identifying the structure of sense of place across a social-ecological landscape
    Rajala, Kiandra
    Sorice, Michael G.
    Thomas, Valerie A.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2020, 2 (03) : 718 - 733
  • [35] Modelling and simulating change in reforesting mountain landscapes using a social-ecological framework
    Gibon, Annick
    Sheeren, David
    Monteil, Claude
    Ladet, Sylvie
    Balent, Gerard
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2010, 25 (02) : 267 - 285
  • [36] Using agent-based modelling to simulate social-ecological systems across scales
    Lippe, Melvin
    Bithell, Mike
    Gotts, Nick
    Natalini, Davide
    Barbrook-Johnson, Peter
    Giupponi, Carlo
    Hallier, Mareen
    Hofstede, Gert Jan
    Le Page, Christophe
    Matthews, Robin B.
    Schluter, Maja
    Smith, Peter
    Teglio, Andrea
    Thellmann, Kevin
    GEOINFORMATICA, 2019, 23 (02) : 269 - 298
  • [37] A review of vulnerability indicators for deltaic social-ecological systems
    Sebesvari, Zita
    Renaud, Fabrice G.
    Haas, Susanne
    Tessler, Zachary
    Hagenlocher, Michael
    Kloos, Julia
    Szabo, Sylvia
    Tejedor, Alejandro
    Kuenzer, Claudia
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2016, 11 (04) : 575 - 590
  • [38] A social-ecological analysis of the global agrifood system
    Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
    Ruiz-Almeida, Adriana
    Aguado, Mateo
    Gonzalez, Jose A.
    Rivera-Ferre, Marta G.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (52) : 26465 - 26473
  • [39] Addressing Social-Ecological Systems across Temporal and Spatial Scales: a Conceptual Synthesis for Ethnobiology
    Albuquerque, Ulysses Paulino
    Ludwig, David
    Feitosa, Ivanilda Soares
    de Moura, Joelson Moreno Brito
    de Medeiros, Patricia Muniz
    Goncalves, Paulo Henrique Santos
    da Silva, Risoneide Henriques
    da Silva, Taline Cristina
    Goncalves-Souza, Thiago
    Ferreira Junior, Washington Soares
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2020, 48 (05) : 557 - 571
  • [40] Community-based scenario planning: a process for vulnerability analysis and adaptation planning to social-ecological change in coastal communities
    Bennett, Nathan James
    Kadfak, Alin
    Dearden, Philip
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 18 (06) : 1771 - 1799