Living with wildlife: a review of advances in social-ecological analysis across landscapes

被引:6
|
作者
Hull, Vanessa [1 ]
Bian, Xiaoxing [1 ,2 ]
Episcopio-Sturgeon, Diane J. [1 ,2 ]
Rivera, Christian J. [3 ]
Rojas-Bonzi, Viviana [1 ,4 ]
Morzillo, Anita T. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, 110 Newins Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, 2035 McCarty Hall D,POB 116455, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, High Meadows Environm Inst, M31 Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[4] IIBP, 1607 Escudo, Asuncion 1425, Paraguay
[5] Univ Connecticut, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, 1376 Storrs Rd,Unit 4087, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
Co-existence; Coupled human and natural systems; Human-wildlife interactions; Social-ecological systems; SPATIAL OVERLAP; ATTITUDES; MODEL; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAGMENTATION; INFORMATION; INTEGRATION; UNDERSTAND; CONFLICTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-023-01778-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
ContextAn exciting research frontier is the intersection of wildlife ecology and social science. Associated research is embracing a spatial approach to integrating ecological and social data to investigate the complex relationships between wildlife and humans across landscapes. However, there is a lack of coherence on the status, current methodology, and potential future directions of this body of research to advance landscape analyses.ObjectivesWe provided a review of the current state of the science of social-ecological research and modeling of human-wildlife interactions across space, with a goal of compiling state-of-the-art approaches, methods, major findings, limitations, and future directions.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed journal articles published from January 2000 to August 2023. We synthesized methods, lessons learned, and key themes in the literature.ResultsSynthesized findings pointed to the importance of spatial context in shaping wildlife and human attributes and their interactions, and the demonstrated value of adding social science data to contest past practices of oversimplifying the complex drivers of human-wildlife interactions. Challenges and limitations included spatial scale mismatches, the limits of assigning causality, misaligned terminology, and need for more in-depth and diverse social science data collection methods and frameworks.ConclusionsThese studies highlighted the potential for social-ecological analyses to inform management through identification of key levers, scenario modeling, and avoidance of "panacea traps." Our results also chart a path forward that calls for more extensive data integration, investigation of feedbacks, and multi-scale approaches to more deeply understand human-wildlife relationships across landscapes.
引用
收藏
页码:4385 / 4402
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Governance of food systems across scales in times of social-ecological change: a review of indicators
    Aogán Delaney
    Tom Evans
    John McGreevy
    Jordan Blekking
    Tyler Schlachter
    Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki
    Peter A. Tamás
    Todd A. Crane
    Hallie Eakin
    Wiebke Förch
    Lindsey Jones
    Donald R. Nelson
    Christoph Oberlack
    Mark Purdon
    Stephan Rist
    Food Security, 2018, 10 : 287 - 310
  • [22] A Framework for Tracing Social-Ecological Trajectories and Traps in Intensive Agricultural Landscapes
    Uden, Daniel R.
    Allen, Craig R.
    Munoz-Arriola, Francisco
    Ou, Gengxin
    Shank, Nancy
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (05)
  • [23] Biocultural restoration improves delivery of ecosystem services in social-ecological landscapes
    Sena, Pedro H. A.
    Goncalves-Souza, Thiago
    Goncalves, Paulo H. S.
    Ferreira, Paulo S. M.
    Gusmao, Reginaldo A. F.
    Melo, Felipe P. L.
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (05)
  • [24] Keeping up with the landscapes: promoting resilience in dynamic social-ecological systems
    Manley, Patricia N.
    Long, Jonathan W.
    Scheller, Robert M.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 29 (01):
  • [25] A Social-Ecological Review of Cancer Disparities in Kentucky
    Rodriguez, Sharon D.
    Vanderford, Nathan L.
    Huang, Bin
    Vanderpool, Robin C.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 111 (04) : 213 - 219
  • [26] Planning future landscapes in the wet tropics of Australia: A social-ecological framework
    Bohnet, Iris
    Smith, Douglas Mark
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2007, 80 (1-2) : 137 - 152
  • [27] Characterizing social-ecological units to inform biodiversity conservation in cultural landscapes
    Hanspach, Jan
    Loos, Jacqueline
    Dorresteijn, Ine
    Abson, David J.
    Fischer, Joern
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2016, 22 (08) : 853 - 864
  • [28] Living on the edge: Ecological and cultural edges as sources of diversity for social-ecological resilience
    Turner, NJ
    Davidson-Hunt, IJ
    O'Flaherty, M
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2003, 31 (03) : 439 - 461
  • [29] Advances in understanding the evolution of institutions in complex social-ecological systems
    Epstein, Graham
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    Lien, Aaron
    Gurney, Georgina G.
    Cole, Daniel H.
    Delaroche, Martin
    Tomas, Sergio Villamayor
    Ban, Natalie
    Cox, Michael
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 44 : 58 - 66
  • [30] Cultivating an Active Living Plan Through a Social-Ecological Evaluation
    Prochnow, Tyler
    Patterson, Megan S.
    Amo, Christina
    Curran, Laurel
    Francis, Allison N.
    Green, Emily
    FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2023, 46 (04) : 229 - 241