Use of a deep learning algorithm for non-mass enhancement on breast MRI: comparison with radiologists' interpretations at various levels

被引:14
作者
Goto, Mariko [1 ]
Sakai, Koji [1 ]
Toyama, Yasuchiyo [1 ]
Nakai, Yoshitomo [1 ]
Yamada, Kei [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Radiol, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyoku, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
关键词
Breast cancer; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Non-mass enhancement; Deep learning; BI-RADS; LESIONS; TUMOR; MICROENVIRONMENT; CRITERIA; NONMASS;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-023-01435-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning using the Residual Networks 50 (ResNet50) neural network constructed from different segmentations for distinguishing malignant and benign non-mass enhancement (NME) on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conduct a comparison with radiologists with various levels of experience.Materials and methodsA total of 84 consecutive patients with 86 lesions (51 malignant, 35 benign) presenting NME on breast MRI were analyzed. Three radiologists with different levels of experience evaluated all examinations, based on the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon and categorization. For the deep learning method, one expert radiologist performed lesion annotation manually using the early phase of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Two segmentation methods were applied: a precise segmentation was carefully set to include only the enhancing area, and a rough segmentation covered the whole enhancing region, including the intervenient non-enhancing area. ResNet50 was implemented using the DCE MRI input. The diagnostic performance of the radiologists' readings and deep learning were then compared using receiver operating curve analysis.ResultsThe ResNet50 model from precise segmentation achieved diagnostic accuracy equivalent [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90, 0.93] to that of a highly experienced radiologist (AUC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81, 0.96; p = 0.45). Even the model from rough segmentation showed diagnostic performance equivalent to a board-certified radiologist (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.78, 0.82 vs. AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70, 0.89, respectively). Both ResNet50 models from the precise and rough segmentation exceeded the diagnostic accuracy of a radiology resident (AUC = 0.64, 95% CI 0.52, 0.76).ConclusionThese findings suggest that the deep learning model from ResNet50 has the potential to ensure accuracy in the diagnosis of NME on breast MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1103
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] PRE-OPERATIVE PLANNING USING REAL-TIME VIRTUAL SONOGRAPHY, AN MRI/ULTRASOUND IMAGE FUSION TECHNIQUE, FOR BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH NON-MASS ENHANCEMENT ON BREAST MRI: A PRELIMINARY STUDY
    Ando, Takahito
    Ito, Yukie
    Ido, Mirai
    Osawa, Manami
    Kousaka, Junko
    Mouri, Yukako
    Fujii, Kimihito
    Nakano, Shogo
    Kimura, Junko
    Ishiguchi, Tsuneo
    Watanebe, Rie
    Imai, Tsuneo
    Fukutomi, Takashi
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (07) : 1364 - 1370
  • [32] Prediction of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer with non-mass enhancement by DCE-MRI and clinicopathological features: a retrospective case-control study
    Guo, Shiqi
    Zhao, Kai
    Xie, Yujiao
    Li, Qingyang
    Chen, Siyi
    Sun, Jiahong
    Gao, Zhaofeng
    Zhu, Li
    Wang, Jiandong
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2025, 55
  • [33] Does deep learning software improve the consistency and performance of radiologists with various levels of experience in assessing bi-parametric prostate MRI?
    Aydan Arslan
    Deniz Alis
    Servet Erdemli
    Mustafa Ege Seker
    Gokberk Zeybel
    Sabri Sirolu
    Serpil Kurtcan
    Ercan Karaarslan
    Insights into Imaging, 14
  • [34] Does deep learning software improve the consistency and performance of radiologists with various levels of experience in assessing bi-parametric prostate MRI?
    Arslan, Aydan
    Alis, Deniz
    Erdemli, Servet
    Seker, Mustafa Ege
    Zeybel, Gokberk
    Sirolu, Sabri
    Kurtcan, Serpil
    Karaarslan, Ercan
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [35] Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy
    Asada, Tatsunori
    Yamada, Takayuki
    Kanemaki, Yoshihide
    Fujiwara, Keishi
    Okamoto, Satoko
    Nakajima, Yasuo
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 36 (03) : 200 - 208
  • [36] Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy Between Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and DCE-MRI for Mass- and Non-Mass-Like Enhancement Types in Breast Lesions
    Liu, Wei
    Zong, Min
    Gong, Hai-yan
    Ling, Li-jun
    Ye, Xin-hua
    Wang, Shui
    Li, Cui-ying
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 13567 - 13578
  • [37] Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics and apparent diffusion coefficient with Ki-67-positive expression in non-mass enhancement of breast cancer
    Nie, Tingting
    Feng, Mengwei
    Yang, Kai
    Guo, Xiaofang
    Yuan, Zilong
    Zhang, Zhaoxi
    Yan, Gen
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [38] Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy
    Tatsunori Asada
    Takayuki Yamada
    Yoshihide Kanemaki
    Keishi Fujiwara
    Satoko Okamoto
    Yasuo Nakajima
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2018, 36 : 200 - 208