Use of a deep learning algorithm for non-mass enhancement on breast MRI: comparison with radiologists' interpretations at various levels

被引:14
|
作者
Goto, Mariko [1 ]
Sakai, Koji [1 ]
Toyama, Yasuchiyo [1 ]
Nakai, Yoshitomo [1 ]
Yamada, Kei [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Radiol, 465 Kajiicho, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyoku, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
关键词
Breast cancer; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Non-mass enhancement; Deep learning; BI-RADS; LESIONS; TUMOR; MICROENVIRONMENT; CRITERIA; NONMASS;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-023-01435-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning using the Residual Networks 50 (ResNet50) neural network constructed from different segmentations for distinguishing malignant and benign non-mass enhancement (NME) on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and conduct a comparison with radiologists with various levels of experience.Materials and methodsA total of 84 consecutive patients with 86 lesions (51 malignant, 35 benign) presenting NME on breast MRI were analyzed. Three radiologists with different levels of experience evaluated all examinations, based on the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon and categorization. For the deep learning method, one expert radiologist performed lesion annotation manually using the early phase of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Two segmentation methods were applied: a precise segmentation was carefully set to include only the enhancing area, and a rough segmentation covered the whole enhancing region, including the intervenient non-enhancing area. ResNet50 was implemented using the DCE MRI input. The diagnostic performance of the radiologists' readings and deep learning were then compared using receiver operating curve analysis.ResultsThe ResNet50 model from precise segmentation achieved diagnostic accuracy equivalent [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90, 0.93] to that of a highly experienced radiologist (AUC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81, 0.96; p = 0.45). Even the model from rough segmentation showed diagnostic performance equivalent to a board-certified radiologist (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI 0.78, 0.82 vs. AUC = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70, 0.89, respectively). Both ResNet50 models from the precise and rough segmentation exceeded the diagnostic accuracy of a radiology resident (AUC = 0.64, 95% CI 0.52, 0.76).ConclusionThese findings suggest that the deep learning model from ResNet50 has the potential to ensure accuracy in the diagnosis of NME on breast MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:1094 / 1103
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Use of a deep learning algorithm for non-mass enhancement on breast MRI: comparison with radiologists’ interpretations at various levels
    Mariko Goto
    Koji Sakai
    Yasuchiyo Toyama
    Yoshitomo Nakai
    Kei Yamada
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2023, 41 : 1094 - 1103
  • [2] Significant MRI indicators of malignancy for breast non-mass enhancement
    Yang, Quan-Xin
    Ji, Xing
    Feng, Lin-Lin
    Zheng, Long
    Zhou, Xiao-Qian
    Wu, Qian
    Chen, Xin
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 25 (06) : 1033 - 1044
  • [3] Non-mass enhancement on breast MRI: Clues to a more confident diagnosis
    Mohamed, Sara
    Elhamd, Eman Abo
    Attia, Noha M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01)
  • [4] Descriptors of Malignant Non-mass Enhancement of Breast MRI: Their Correlation to the Presence of Invasion
    Machida, Youichi
    Shimauchi, Akiko
    Tozaki, Mitsuhiro
    Kuroki, Yoshifumi
    Yoshida, Tamiko
    Fukuma, Ei'suke
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (06) : 687 - 695
  • [5] Diagnostic value of mammography for accompanying non-mass enhancement on preoperative breast MRI
    Kim, Yunju
    Jung, Hae Kyoung
    Park, Ah Young
    Ko, Kyung Hee
    Jang, Hyunkyung
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2022, 63 (08) : 1032 - 1042
  • [6] The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy
    Aydin, Hale
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1096)
  • [7] Non-mass enhancement breast lesions: MRI findings and associations with malignancy
    Liu, Gang
    Li, Ying
    Chen, Si-Lu
    Chen, Qiao
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [8] Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Papillary Neoplasms on MRI With Non-mass Enhancement
    Zhou, Juan
    Li, Mei
    Liu, Dongqing
    Sheng, Fugeng
    Cai, Jianming
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 30 : S127 - S132
  • [9] Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis or Breast Cancer? A Comparative MRI Study in Patients Presenting with Non-Mass Enhancement
    Boy, Fatma Nur Soylu
    Icten, Gul Esen
    Kayadibi, Yasemin
    Tasdelen, Iksan
    Alver, Dolunay
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (08)
  • [10] Clumped vs non-clumped internal enhancement patterns in linear non-mass enhancement on breast MRI
    Chen, Shu Tian
    Covelli, James
    Okamoto, Satoko
    Daniel, Bruce L.
    DeMartini, Wendy B.
    Ikeda, Debra M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1118)