Individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search while reading

被引:3
作者
Redden, Ralph S. [1 ,2 ]
Eady, Kaylee [3 ]
Klein, Raymond M. [1 ]
Saint-Aubin, Jean [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Psychol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Moncton, Ecole Psychol, Moncton, NB E1A 3E9, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Individual differences; Missing-letter effect; Reading; Visual search; Working memory capacity; UNITS LARGER; EXECUTIVE ATTENTION; DETECTION ERRORS; EYE-MOVEMENTS; TOP-DOWN; TASK; WORD; MODELS; ROLES;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-022-01357-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individual differences in working memory capacity are related to variations in a wide range of cognitive tasks. Surprisingly, effects of individual differences in working memory capacity are somewhat limited in visual search tasks. Here we tested the hypothesis that such an effect would be robust when search was one component of a dual task. Participants were presented strings of letters using rapid serial visual presentation and were required to detect all instances of a particular target letter. In Experiment 1, participants performed the letter search task in three contexts, while: (a) reading a prose passage, (b) processing a stream of random words, or (c) processing a random stream of non-words. In the absence of the dual task of reading prose, and in line with much of the literature on individual differences in working memory capacity and visual search, search performance was unaffected by working memory capacity. As hypothesized, however, higher working memory capacity participants detected more target letters than lower capacity participants in the "true" dual task (searching while reading prose). The hypothesized results from the prose passage were replicated in Experiment 2. These results show that visual search efficiency is dramatically affected by working memory capacity when searching is combined with another cognitive task but not when it is performed in isolation. Our findings are consistent with recent suggestions that visual search efficiency will be affected by working memory capacity so long as searching is embedded in a context that entails managing resource allocation between concurrent tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 335
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Contrasting effects of age of acquisition in lexical decision and letter detection [J].
Assink, EMH ;
Van Well, S ;
Knuijt, PPNA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 116 (03) :367-387
[2]   OVERRIDING STIMULUS-DRIVEN ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE [J].
BACON, WF ;
EGETH, HE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 55 (05) :485-496
[3]   The influence of working memory capacity on high-level cognition mediated by complexity or resource-dependent elementary processes? [J].
Barrouillet, Pierre ;
Lepine, Raphaelle ;
Camos, Valerie .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2008, 15 (03) :528-534
[4]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[5]  
Brysbaert Marc, 2018, J Cogn, V1, P9, DOI 10.5334/joc.10
[6]   The interaction of word frequency and word class: A test of the GO model's account of the missing-letter effect [J].
Charland, AR ;
Saint-Aubin, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (01) :38-45
[7]   Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening [J].
Colflesh, Gregory J. H. ;
Conway, Andrew R. A. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (04) :699-703
[8]   Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Kane, MJ ;
Bunting, MF ;
Hambrick, DZ ;
Wilhelm, O ;
Engle, RW .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2005, 12 (05) :769-786
[9]   Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Kane, MJ ;
Engle, RW .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (12) :547-552
[10]   The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Cowan, N ;
Bunting, MF .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2001, 8 (02) :331-335