Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?

被引:42
作者
Utami, Santi Pratiwi Tri [1 ,2 ]
Andayani [1 ]
Winarni, Retno [1 ]
Sumarwati [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
关键词
perception; AI technology; learning tools; academic writing; USER ACCEPTANCE; AI;
D O I
10.30935/cedtech/13419
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research shows that artificial intelligence (AI) technology positively influences students' writing skills, but this area has yet to be touched by Indonesian researchers. This study aims to map perception, obstacles, and recommendations for optimizing use of AI in teaching academic writing in Indonesian. This article focuses on a case study of three senior high schools in Central Java, Indonesia. It employs quantitative and qualitative data. The researcher collected the data using questionnaires presented with Likert scale, followed by an in-depth interview through mobile instant messaging interview. Findings show that (1) AI-based learning tools help students to do academic research, especially in the planning step, to identify and develop the topics, as well as in the drafting step, to develop a paper draft, (2) AI-based learning tools are deemed flexible in accessibility despite not being able to cover all necessities required by students in writing process, (3) students are interested in using AI technology in academic writing class so that learning process will not be boring. Although AI has been used in academic writing classes, tools have not positively impacted quality of students' academic papers in all indicators. There are several obstacles to using AI, namely (1) need for more available feature, especially in editing Indonesian text, and (2) in contrast, the features still need to be optimized. These are the recommendations for the optimization of AI-based learning tools, which are (1) adding features to edit Indonesian text, including spelling, diction, and sentence structure, and (2) enhancing AI literacy to be able to explore and leverage the existing features optimally. This research has yet to accommodate the possible coverage in checking the originality and accuracy of the written product assisted by AI-based learning tools, which could become a focus for future researchers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Abdalkader SMA, 2022, Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences, V2, P39, DOI [10.21608/ejes.2022.270694, DOI 10.21608/EJES.2022.270694]
[2]  
*AG CAL ED, 2017, INF RES APR ESCR 201
[3]  
Alharbi W, 2023, EDUC RES INT, V2023, P1, DOI [10.1155/2023/4253331, 10.1155/2023/4253331, DOI 10.1155/2023/4253331]
[4]   Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe? [J].
Altmae, Signe ;
Sola-Leyva, Alberto ;
Salumets, Andres .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2023, 47 (01) :3-9
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 2012470 NCES
[6]  
Ary D., 2018, INTRO RES ED
[7]  
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA), 2021, National assessment program: literacy and numeracy
[8]   Teaching writing in grades 4-6 in urban schools in Chile: a national survey [J].
Banales, Gerardo ;
Ahumada, Silza ;
Graham, Steve ;
Puente, Anibal ;
Guajardo, Marcela ;
Munoz, Ignacio .
READING AND WRITING, 2020, 33 (10) :2661-2696
[9]  
BURKHARD M, 2022, P 19TH INT C COGN EX
[10]   Fostering parental involvement in writing: development and testing of the program Cultivating Writing [J].
Camacho, Ana ;
Alves, Rui A. .
READING AND WRITING, 2017, 30 (02) :253-277