Governing principles: Articulating values in social media platform policies

被引:20
作者
Scharlach, Rebecca [1 ]
Hallinan, Blake [1 ]
Shifman, Limor [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Commun & Journalism, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
boundary objects; Facebook; Instagram; platform policies; TikTok; Twitter; values; YouTube; INTERNET GOVERNANCE; FACEBOOK;
D O I
10.1177/14614448231156580
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
As sites where social media corporations profess their commitment to principles like community and free speech, policy documents function as boundary objects that navigate diverse audiences, purposes, and interests. This article compares the discourse of values in the Privacy Policies, Terms of Service, and Community Guidelines of five major platforms (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, and TikTok). Through a mixed-methods analysis, we identified frequently mentioned value terms and five overarching principles consistent across platforms: expression, community, safety, choice, and improvement. However, platforms limit their burden to execute these values by selectively assigning responsibility for their enactment, often unloading such responsibility onto users. Moreover, while each of the core values may potentially serve the public good, they can also promote narrow corporate goals. This dual framing allows platforms to strategically reinterpret values to suit their own interests.
引用
收藏
页码:6658 / 6677
页数:20
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Crashworthiness analysis and shape design optimization of corrugated tubes for railway application [J].
Ahn, Seung Ho ;
Jung, Hyun Seung ;
Kim, Jin Sung ;
Son, Seung Wan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS, 2023, 28 (03) :390-401
[2]  
Andersson Schwarz J., 2022, CREATING MORE TRANSP, P129
[3]  
Arun C., 2022, HARVARD LAW REV
[4]   Value in Informational Capitalism and on the Internet [J].
Arvidsson, Adam ;
Colleoni, Elanor .
INFORMATION SOCIETY, 2012, 28 (03) :135-150
[5]   Platform transience: changes in Facebook's policies, procedures, and affordances in global electoral politics [J].
Barrett, Bridget ;
Kreiss, Daniel .
INTERNET POLICY REVIEW, 2019, 8 (04)
[6]   Big data analytics and the limits of privacy self-management [J].
Baruh, Lemi ;
Popescu, Mihaela .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2017, 19 (04) :579-596
[7]  
Baym Nancy., 2000, Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community
[8]   Data as asset? The measurement, governance, and valuation of digital personal data by Big Tech [J].
Birch, Kean ;
Cochrane, D. T. ;
Ward, Callum .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2021, 8 (01)
[9]  
Boltanski Luc., 2006, On Justification: Economies of Worth
[10]   Isomorphism through algorithms: Institutional dependencies in the case of Facebook [J].
Caplan, Robyn ;
Boyd, Danah .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2018, 5 (01)