German translation and validation of the Interprofessional Facilitation Scale

被引:0
作者
Kerry, Matthew J. [1 ,4 ]
Paignon, Adeline [2 ,3 ]
Wiesner Conti, Joanne [2 ]
Sy, Michael [1 ]
Huber, Marion [1 ]
机构
[1] Zurich Univ Appl Sci ZHAW, Inst Hlth Sci, Winterthur, Switzerland
[2] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland HES SO, Geneva Sch Hlth Sci, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland HES SO, Ctr Interprofess Simulat, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Zurich Univ Appl Sci ZHAW, Hlth Dept, Katharina Sulzer Pl 9, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
Interprofessional education; Interprofessional Facilitation Scale; IPFS; item response theory; teamwork;
D O I
10.1080/13561820.2023.2287024
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We identified evidence from item response theory (IRT) to examine a German translation of the Interprofessional Facilitation Scale (IPFS). The IPFS was administered to n = 130 mixed-health profession participants in a post-interprofessional education practicum questionnaire. We used IRT analyses to examine the following three aspects of the IPFS: (a) general factor strength, (b) subscale usability, and (c) item bias. First, findings indicate a strong, general factor underlying the IPFS that supports unidimensional interpretations. Second, findings supported IPFS overall reliability, but failed to support subscale reliabilities. Third, item bias assessment using a comparator-French sample (n = 89) indicated insubstantial differences across German and French samples. Taken together, we find sufficient evidence to support the IPFS-German translation's application in IPE contexts and unidimensional interpretations. Subscores are not advisable for interpretation, and future researchers should aim to further inspect potential item bias.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 398
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1996, NAT BOARD MED EX PHI
  • [2] Making Reliability Reliable: A Systematic Approach to Reliability Coefficients
    Cho, Eunseong
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2016, 19 (04) : 651 - 682
  • [3] Dueber D.M., 2017, Bifactor Indices Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate various indices relevant to bifactor CFA models, DOI DOI 10.13023/EDP.TOOL.01
  • [4] Embretson SE., 2000, Item response theory, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781410605269, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605269]
  • [5] A Systematic Review of the Outcome Measures Used to Evaluate Interprofessional Learning by Health Care Professional Students During Clinical Experiences
    Guitar, Nicole A.
    Connelly, Denise M.
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2021, 44 (03) : 293 - 311
  • [6] Translation and cultural adaptation of the Japanese version of the interprofessional facilitation scale
    Haruta, Junji
    Breugelmans, Raoul
    Nishigori, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2018, 32 (03) : 321 - 328
  • [7] Position paper of the GMA Committee Interprofessional Education in the Health Professions current status and outlook
    Kaap-Froehlich, Sylvia
    Ulrich, Gert
    Wershofen, Birgit
    Ahles, Jonathan
    Behrend, Ronja
    Handgraaf, Marietta
    Herinek, Doreen
    Mitzkat, Anika
    Oberhauser, Heidi
    Scherer, Theresa
    Schlicker, Andrea
    Straub, Christine
    Eichler, Regina Waury
    Wesselborg, Baerbel
    Witti, Matthias
    Huber, Marion
    Bode, Sebastin F. N.
    [J]. GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2022, 39 (02):
  • [8] Quantitative methods in interprofessional education research: some critical reflections and ideas to improving rigor
    Kerry, Matthew James
    Huber, Marion
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2018, 32 (03) : 254 - 256
  • [9] McDonald R. P., 2013, TEST THEORY UNIFIED, DOI [10.4324/9781410601087, DOI 10.4324/9781410601087]
  • [10] ON STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING WITH DATA THAT ARE NOT MISSING COMPLETELY AT RANDOM
    MUTHEN, B
    KAPLAN, D
    HOLLIS, M
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) : 431 - 462