Prompt penetration effects on Equatorial Electrojet from the Indian sector

被引:3
作者
Archana, R. K. [1 ,2 ]
Arora, Kusumita [1 ]
Nagarajan, Nandini [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIR Natl Geophys Res Inst, Hyderabad, India
[2] Andhra Univ, Vishakhapatnam, India
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2023年 / 75卷 / 01期
关键词
Prompt penetration; Equatorial Electrojet; Counter electrojet; FIELDS; FLUCTUATIONS; IONOSPHERE;
D O I
10.1186/s40623-023-01874-9
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The morphology of prompt penetration effects (PP) in the Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) at Vencode ( VEN, Geomagnetic latitude 0.29 degrees N) was studied using 5-min samples of EEJ and interplanetary Ey component data from 2011 to 2015. In contrast to previous studies that mainly focused on storm-time PP events, our study investigated the characteristics of PP effects on EEJ during both quiet and disturbed periods. Our findings reaffirm earlier reports of high PP efficiency during local noon for both quiet and disturbed days. Moreover, PP amplitudes were greater when IMF-Bz was oriented northward compared to southward, indicating the presence of overshielding effects even during quiet conditions. Additionally, we examined seasonal variations in PP amplitudes and observed weaker PP during the solstice compared to the equinox. Furthermore, our study analysed the equatorial counter electrojet (CEJ) caused by PP events associated with northward-turning IMF-Bz. We report 15% of CEJs at VEN associated with PP effects; a few PP events were observed while the equatorial electric field at VEN was already westward (i.e. PP within CEJ), indicating the combined effects of magnetospheric and ionospheric perturbations. Identifying CEJs caused by PP during quiet days helps to differentiate between magnetospheric and ionospheric mechanisms/processes. Additionally, we investigated the spatial variability in PP amplitudes at closely spaced sites, utilizing one year of concurrent data from Minicoy (MNC, Geomagnetic latitude 0.19 degrees N), VEN, and Campbell Bay (CBY, Geomagnetic latitude 0.29 degrees N) situated at geographic longitudes 72 degrees, 77 degrees and 93 degrees, respectively. Our results showed significant differences in PP amplitudes between VEN- CBY and MNC-CBY, separated by 15 degrees and 20 degrees longitude, respectively. Observations from the three equatorial sites demonstrated a longitudinal trend, with PP amplitudes increasing westward towards MNC, inverse to the amplitudes of EEJ.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Estimating daytime vertical ExB drift velocities in the equatorial F-region using ground-based magnetometer observations [J].
Anderson, D ;
Anghel, A ;
Yumoto, K ;
Ishitsuka, M ;
Kudeki, E .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2002, 29 (12) :37-1
[2]   Constraints on Scale Lengths of Equatorial Electrojet and Counter Electrojet Phenomena From the Indian Sector [J].
Archana, R. K. ;
Chandrasekhar, N. Phani ;
Arora, Kusumita ;
Nagarajan, Nandini .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2018, 123 (08) :6821-6835
[3]   Characteristics of penetration electric fields to the equatorial ionosphere during southward and northward IMF turnings [J].
Bhaskar, Ankush ;
Vichare, Geeta .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2013, 118 (07) :4696-4709
[4]   Spatial Variations in Disturbance Ionospheric Currents-Inference From 12 Geomagnetic Storms [J].
Bulusu, Jayashree ;
Archana, R. K. ;
Arora, Kusumita .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2020, 125 (08)
[5]   Effect of Disturbance Electric Fields on Equatorial Electrojet Over Indian Longitudes [J].
Bulusu, Jayashree ;
Archana, R. K. ;
Arora, Kusumita ;
Chandrasekhar, N. Phani ;
Nagarajan, Nandini .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2018, 123 (07) :5894-5916
[6]   SPECTRAL STUDIES OF THE SOURCES OF IONOSPHERIC ELECTRIC-FIELDS [J].
EARLE, GD ;
KELLEY, MC .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1987, 92 (A1) :213-224
[7]   Equatorial ionospheric electric fields during the November 2004 magnetic storm [J].
Fejer, B. G. ;
Jensen, J. W. ;
Kikuchi, T. ;
Abdu, M. A. ;
Chau, J. L. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2007, 112 (A10)
[8]  
Fejer B.G., 1997, J. Geophys. Res, V102, p24,407
[9]  
Fejer BG, 1986, SOLAR WIND MAGNETOSP, P519, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4722-1_37
[10]  
Gonzaga C., 1989, PROGR MATH PROGRAMMI, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-9617-8_1