The meaning of R1 resection after endoscopic removal of gastric, duodenal and rectal neuroendocrine tumors

被引:8
作者
Esposito, Gianluca [1 ]
Dell'Unto, Elisabetta [1 ]
Ligato, Irene [1 ]
Marasco, Matteo [1 ]
Panzuto, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, St andrea Univ Hosp, ENETS Ctr Excellence, Dept Med Surg Sci,Translat Med,Digest Dis Unit, Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, St Andrea Univ Hosp, Dept Med Surg Sci & Translat Med, Via Grottarossa 1035, I-00189 Rome, Italy
关键词
endoscopy; neuroendocrine tumors; stomach; rectum; duodenum; tumor progression; residual disease; polypectomy; CARCINOID-TUMORS; MUCOSAL RESECTION; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOMES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; NON-AMPULLARY; RISK-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242261
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionWell-differentiated gastric, duodenal, and rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NETs) are rare diseases usually managed by endoscopic treatment. Although several endoscopic techniques are available, the number of patients with incomplete (R1) resection is significant.Areas coveredThis review focuses on the meaning of incomplete R1 findings after endoscopic resection in type I gastric NETs; nonfunctioning, non-ampullary duodenal NETs; and small rectal NETs. Data were identified by MEDLINE database search without publication date limitation.Expert opinionAn incomplete R1 finding may have no significant impact on a patient's clinical outcome, particularly in small G1 type I gastric NETs, which have an indolent course. A 'stepwise approach,' which uses more advanced endoscopic techniques, or minimally invasive surgery may be justified to achieve complete margin-free resection. This approach must balance the tumor features and the procedure-related risk of complications, particularly in the duodenum, where the role of deep endoscopic resections is limited due to the thin duodenal wall. Gastric and rectal NETs that are incompletely removed after initial resection are more easily amenable to deep endoscopic techniques. However, this might not be necessary for patients with comorbidities, elderly, or both due to the uncertainty of how R1 finding impacts a patient's clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 793
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [21] Clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumor
    Kim, Jihye
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Lee, Joo Young
    Chun, Jaeyoung
    Im, Jong Pil
    Kim, Joo Sung
    [J]. BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [22] Treatment outcomes according to endoscopic treatment modalities for rectal carcinoid tumors
    Kim, Kwang Min
    Eo, Sung June
    Shim, Sang Goon
    Choi, Jong Hak
    Min, Byung-Hoon
    Lee, Jun Haeng
    Chang, Dong Kyung
    Kim, Young-Ho
    Rhee, Poong-Lyul
    Kim, Jae J.
    Rhee, Jong Chul
    Kim, Jin Yong
    [J]. CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 37 (03) : 275 - 282
  • [23] Endoscopic Treatment of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Kim, Sang Ho
    Park, Chang Hwan
    Ki, Ho Seok
    Jun, Chung Hwan
    Park, Seon Young
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    Choi, Sung Kyu
    Rew, Jong Sun
    [J]. CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 46 (06) : 656 - 661
  • [24] Rectal carcinoid tumors - Review of results after endoscopic and surgical therapy
    Kwaan, Mary R.
    Goldberg, Joel E.
    Bleday, Ronald
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2008, 143 (05) : 471 - 475
  • [25] Long-term Outcome of Small, Incidentally Detected Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Removed by Simple Excisional Biopsy Compared With the Advanced Endoscopic Resection During Screening Colonoscopy
    Kwak, Min-Sun
    Chung, Su Jin
    Yang, Jong In
    Im, Jong Pil
    Park, Min Jung
    Lee, Cheol
    Kim, Joo Sung
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (03) : 338 - 346
  • [26] Long-term follow up of endoscopic resection for type 3 gastric NET
    Kwon, Yong Hwan
    Jeon, Seong Woo
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Kim, Jin Il
    Chung, Il-Kwun
    Jee, Sam Ryong
    Kim, Heung Up
    Seo, Geom Seog
    Baik, Gwang Ho
    Choi, Kee Don
    Moon, Jeong Seop
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (46) : 8703 - 8708
  • [27] Comparison of conventional and modified endoscopic mucosal resection methods for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
    Lee, Hee Sung
    Moon, Hee Seok
    Kwon, In Sun
    Park, Jae Ho
    Kim, Ju Seok
    Kang, Sun Hyung
    Lee, Eaum Seok
    Kim, Seok Hyun
    Sung, Jae Kyu
    Lee, Byung Seok
    Jeong, Hyun Yong
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (11): : 6055 - 6065
  • [28] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for foregut neuroendocrine tumors: An initial study
    Li, Quan-Lin
    Zhang, Yi-Qun
    Chen, Wei-Feng
    Xu, Mei-Dong
    Zhong, Yun-Shi
    Ma, Li-Li
    Qin, Wen-Zheng
    Hu, Jian-Wei
    Cai, Ming-Yan
    Yao, Li-Qing
    Zhou, Ping-Hong
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (40) : 5799 - 5806
  • [29] Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of 54 Cases of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors with Incomplete Resection: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
    Li, Yan
    Pan, Fei
    Sun, Gang
    Wang, Zi-kai
    Meng, Ke
    Peng, Li-hua
    Lu, Zhong-sheng
    Dou, Yan
    Yan, Bin
    Liu, Qing-sen
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 : 1153 - 1161
  • [30] Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review
    Libanio, Diogo
    Pimentel-Nunes, Pedro
    Bastiaansen, Barbara
    Bisschops, Raf
    Bourke, Michael. J. J.
    Deprez, Pierre. H. H.
    Esposito, Gianluca
    Lemmers, Arnaud
    Leclercq, Philippe
    Maselli, Roberta
    Messmann, Helmut
    Pech, Oliver
    Pioche, Mathieu
    Vieth, Michael
    Weusten, Bas L. A. M.
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (04) : 361 - 389