ASSESSMENT OF COURT FEES' REGULATION AND ITS CORRELATION WITH THE LEVEL OF JUDICIALIZATION: EVIDENCE OF BRAZILIAN STATE COURTS FROM 2009 TO 2018

被引:0
作者
Coelho, Daniela Thomes [1 ]
机构
[1] Escola Direito Rio De Janeiro, Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Law and Economics; regulation; court fees; judicial efficacy; litigation rates;
D O I
10.1590/2317-6172202337
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The economic analysis of the litigation proposes a theoretical model that identify the factors that influence agents' decision-making about whether to turn to the Judici-ary when faced with a conflict. According to this normative model, the low cost of court fees may constitute an incentive to judicialization. The purpose of this paper is to verify whether court fees' price variation can influence lawsuits quantity. Specif-ically, it is an empirical test about the existence of a correlation between the change in the state regulation of court fees and the level of judicialization, measured on the percentage change in the number of cases in the subsequent year. It was adopted a quantitative and descriptive approach, considering the data on court fees and the number of cases from Brazilian's state courts, between the years 2009 to 2018. Through a statistical test of difference of means, it was possible to identify that reductions in court fees are related to an average increase of 6% in the number of cases in the following year. As for the court fees increases, it was not possible to identify a relationship with reductions in the number of cases.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Rents and economic development: the perspective of Why Nations Fail
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Robinson, James A.
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2019, 181 (1-2) : 13 - 28
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, World Development Report 2005: A Better Investment Climate for Everyone
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Migalhas
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1988, Constituicao da Republica Federativa do Brasil: promulgada em 05 de outubro de 1988, V4, P1
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2019, Acao Direta de Inconstitucionalidade por Omissao n˚ 26-DF
  • [6] Baldwin R., 2012, UNDERSTANDING REGULA
  • [7] LITIGATION AND SETTLEMENT UNDER IMPERFECT INFORMATION
    BEBCHUK, LA
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1984, 15 (03) : 404 - 415
  • [8] Judicial reform
    Botero, JC
    La Porta, R
    López-de-Silanes, F
    Shleifer, A
    Volokh, A
    [J]. WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 2003, 18 (01) : 61 - 88
  • [9] BRASIL, 2015, Lei n. 13.105, de 16 de marco de 2015. Codigo de Processo Civil
  • [10] BRASIL, 2019, C NAC PROJ LEI COMPL