Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing

被引:10
作者
de Freitas, Bruna Neves [1 ]
Mendonca, Lucas Moreira [1 ]
Cruvinel, Pedro Bastos [1 ]
de Lacerda, Tito Jose [2 ]
Junqueira Leite, Fernando Goncalves [2 ]
Oliveira-Santos, Christiano [3 ]
Tirapelli, Camila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-14040904 Ribeira Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] DVI Dentomaxillofacial Radiol Ctr, BR-14010180 Ribeira Preto, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Louisville, Dept Diag & Oral Hlth, Sch Dent, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Intraoral scanner; Cone-beam computed tomography; Digital casts; 3D printing; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; LINEAR MEASUREMENTS; DENTAL MODELS; ACCURACY; PLASTER; RELIABILITY; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104387
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: to evaluate trueness and precision of digital casts from intraoral scanning (IOS) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT); trueness and precision of 3D-printed casts using digital light processing (DLP) and fused deposition modeling (FDM); the influence of digitizing method in the 3D-printed casts and, to compare STL data after DICOM segmentation and conversion.Methods: a reference cast was digitized with IOS and CBCT, and 3D-printed using FDM and DLP. Linear mea-surements of occlusocervical (OC), interarch (IEA), and mesiodistal (MD) dimensions were taken on reference, digital and 3D-printed casts. Trueness was observed as the distortion, and precision was observed as the variation of measurements. One and Two-way ANOVA, Student t-test, and Chi-Square were applied to analyze data.Results: distortion varied between digital casts for all dimensions; at OC, both showed expanded dimensions with IOS being significantly greater; in turn, CBCT digital casts showed higher distortion at IEA and MD. Dimensions of 3D-printed casts showed a predominance of shrinkage, DLP presented higher distortion compared to FDM for both digitizing methods. Digitizing methods influenced the 3D-printing of casts, especially for DLP. Regarding precision, no statistical difference was found. STL converted from DICOM showed statistical difference in IEA (p < 0.001).Conclusions: digital casts showed distortion depending on the digitizing method. IOS was better in IEA and MD, and CBCT in OC dimensions. Overall, DLP casts presented higher distortion compared to FDM. The digitizing method influences trueness on 3D-printed casts. File conversion from DICOM to STL per se could change the dimension. Clinical Significance: This investigation showed that digital casts from IOS and CBCT as well 3D-printed casts from FDM and DLP can show different trueness. It is clinically relevant as clinicians have various workflows available in Digital Dentistry which involve these digitizing and manufacturing methods.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Analysis of the mesh resolution of an .STL exported from an intraoral scanner file [J].
Abad-Coronel, Cristian ;
Atria, Pablo J. ;
Munoz, Carla Romero ;
Conejo, Julian ;
Cordova, Nancy Mena ;
Blatz, Markus ;
Pendola, Martin .
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 34 (05) :816-825
[2]   Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors [J].
Abduo, Jaafar ;
Elseyoufi, Mohamed .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 26 (03) :101-121
[3]   Operators matter - An assessment of the expectations, perceptions, and performance of dentists, postgraduate students, and dental prosthetist students using intraoral scanning [J].
Ahmed, Khaled E. ;
Peres, Karen G. ;
Peres, Marco A. ;
Evans, Jane L. ;
Quaranta, Alessandro ;
Burrow, Michael F. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 105
[4]  
Aly Passent, 2020, Eur J Dent, V14, P189, DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1705243
[5]   Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements [J].
Baumgaertel, Sebastian ;
Palomo, J. Martin ;
Palomo, Leena ;
Hans, Mark G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (01) :19-25
[6]   Accuracy and eligibility of CBCT to digitize dental plaster casts [J].
Becker, Kathrin ;
Schmuecker, Ulf ;
Schwarz, Frank ;
Drescher, Dieter .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (04) :1817-1823
[7]   Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases [J].
Camardella, Leonardo Tavares ;
Vilella, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos ;
Breuning, Hero .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (06) :1178-1187
[8]  
Diker B., 2021, J PROSTHET DENT, DOI [10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.007.S0022-3913(20)30797-6, DOI 10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2020.12.007.S0022-3913(20)30797-6]
[9]   Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts [J].
Ellakany, Passent ;
Al-Harbi, Fahad ;
El Tantawi, Maha ;
Mohsen, Cherif .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 127 (03) :438-444
[10]   Comparative Evaluation of Digitization of Diagnostic Dental Cast (Plaster) Models Using Different Scanning Technologies [J].
Emara, Aalaa ;
Sharma, Neha ;
Halbeisen, Florian S. ;
Msallem, Bilal ;
Thieringer, Florian M. .
DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2020, 8 (03)