Treatments and outcomes in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Albright, Benjamin B. [1 ,3 ]
Ellett, Tressa [2 ]
Knochenhauer, Hope E. [2 ]
Goins, Emily C. [2 ]
Monuszko, Karen A. [2 ]
Kaplan, Samantha J. [2 ]
Previs, Rebecca A. [1 ]
Moss, Haley A. [1 ]
Havrilesky, Laura J. [1 ]
Davidson, Brittany A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, 20 Duke Med Circle,Box 3079, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
gestational trophoblastic disease; choriocarcinoma; meta-analysis; systematic reviews; ACTINOMYCIN-D; DISEASE; METHOTREXATE; MANAGEMENT; ETOPOSIDE; CHEMOTHERAPY; VINCRISTINE; EXPERIENCE; EMA; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17374
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundHigh-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is rare and treated with diverse approaches. Limited published institutional data has yet to be systematically reviewed. ObjectivesTo compile global high-risk GTN (prognostic score >= 7) cohorts to summarise treatments and outcomes by disease characteristics and primary chemotherapy. Search StrategyMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane were searched through March 2021. Selection CriteriaFull-text manuscripts reporting mortality among >= 10 high-risk GTN patients. Data Collection and AnalysisBinomial proportions were summed, and random-effects meta-analyses performed. Main ResultsFrom 1137 records, we included 35 studies, representing 20 countries. Among 2276 unique high-risk GTN patients, 99.7% received chemotherapy, 35.8% surgery and 4.9% radiation. Mortality was 10.9% (243/2236; meta-analysis: 10%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-12%) and likelihood of complete response to primary chemotherapy was 79.7% (1506/1890; meta-analysis: 78%, 95% CI: 74-83%). Across 24 reporting studies, modern preferred chemotherapy (EMA/CO or EMA/EP) was associated with lower mortality (overall: 8.8 versus 9.5%; comparative meta-analysis: 8.1 versus 12.4%, OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90%, 14 studies) and higher likelihood of complete response (overall: 76.6 versus 72.8%; comparative meta-analysis: 75.9 versus 60.7%, OR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.06-8.35%, 14 studies), though studies focused on non-preferred regimens reported comparable outcomes. Mortality was increased for ultra-high-risk disease (30 versus 7.5% high-risk; meta-analysis OR 7.44, 95% CI: 4.29-12.9%) and disease following term delivery (20.8 versus 7.3% following molar pregnancy; meta-analysis OR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.10-6.31%). Relapse rate estimates ranged from 3 to 6%. ConclusionsHigh-risk GTN is responsive to several chemotherapy regimens, with EMA/CO or EMA/EP associated with improved outcomes. Mortality is increased in patients with ultra-high-risk, relapsed and post-term pregnancy disease.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 453
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia, Version 2.2019
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Yashar, Catheryn M.
    Bean, Sarah
    Bradley, Kristin
    Campos, Susana M.
    Chon, Hye Sook
    Chu, Christina
    Cohn, David
    Crispens, Marta Ann
    Damast, Shari
    Dorigo, Oliver
    Eifel, Patricia J.
    Fisher, Christine M.
    Frederick, Peter
    Gaffney, David K.
    Han, Ernest
    Huh, Warner K.
    Lurain, John R., III
    Mariani, Andrea
    Mutch, David
    Nagel, Christa
    Nekhlyudov, Larissa
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    Remmenga, Steven W.
    Reynolds, R. Kevin
    Sisodia, Rachel
    Tillmanns, Todd
    Ueda, Stefanie
    Wyse, Emily
    McMillian, Nicole R.
    Scavone, Jillian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2019, 17 (11): : 1374 - 1391
  • [2] Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: treatment outcomes from a single institutional experience
    Al-Husaini, H.
    Soudy, H.
    Darwish, A.
    Ahmed, M.
    Eltigani, A.
    Edesa, W.
    Elhassan, T.
    Omar, A.
    Elghamry, W.
    Al-Hashem, H.
    Al-Hayli, S.
    Madkhali, I.
    Ahmad, S.
    Al-Badawi, I. A.
    [J]. Clinical & Translational Oncology, 2015, 17 (05) : 409 - 415
  • [3] Chemotherapy for resistant or recurrent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Alazzam, Mo'iad
    Tidy, John
    Osborne, Raymond
    Coleman, Robert
    Hancock, Barry W.
    Lawrie, Theresa A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (01):
  • [4] Albright BB., 2021, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V225, pe1
  • [5] Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia After Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Normalization Following Molar Pregnancy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Albright, Benjamin B.
    Shorter, Jade M.
    Mastroyannis, Spyridon A.
    Ko, Emily M.
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Sonalkar, Sarita
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (01) : 12 - 23
  • [6] EMA/CO for High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: Good Outcomes With Induction Low-Dose Etoposide-Cisplatin and Genetic Analysis
    Alifrangis, Constantine
    Agarwal, Roshan
    Short, Delia
    Fisher, Rosemary A.
    Sebire, Neil J.
    Harvey, Richard
    Savage, Philip M.
    Seckl, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (02) : 280 - 286
  • [7] Aminimoghaddam Soheila, 2018, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V32, P36, DOI 10.14196/mjiri.32.36
  • [8] Role of salvage therapy in chemo resistant or recurrent high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasm
    Anantharaju, Arpitha
    Pallavi, V. R.
    Bafna, Uttam D.
    Rathod, Praveen S.
    Vijay, C. R.
    Shobha, K.
    Kundargi, Rajshekar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (03) : 547 - 553
  • [9] Gestational trophoblastic disease in the western region of Saudi Arabia (single-institute experience)
    Anfinan, Nisrin
    Sait, Khalid
    Sait, Hesham
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 180 : 8 - 11
  • [10] Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Green-top Guideline No. 38-September 2020
    Tidy, J.
    Seckl, M.
    Hancock, B. W.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 (03) : E1 - E27