The consequential costs of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) breakdowns in England and Wales

被引:9
作者
Barnes, Andrew P. [1 ]
Moxey, Andrew [2 ]
Brocklehurst, Sarah [3 ]
Barratt, Alyson [1 ]
McKendrick, Iain J. [3 ]
Innocent, Giles [3 ]
Ahmadi, Bouda Vosough [4 ]
机构
[1] Scotlands Rural Coll, Peter Wilson Bldg,Kings Bldg,West Mains Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland
[2] Pareto Consulting, 29 Redford Ave, Edinburgh EH13 0BX, Scotland
[3] Biomath & Stat Scotland, James Clerk Maxwell Bldg,Kings Bldg,Peter Guthrie, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, Scotland
[4] European Commiss Control Foot and Mouth Dis EuFMD, Food & Agr Org FAO, Anim Prod & Hlth Div NSAH, Viale Terme Caracalla, I-00153 Rome, Italy
关键词
Bovine tuberculosis; Economic losses; Consequential costs; Survey; Zoonotic diseases; BRITISH CATTLE; FARMERS; SURVEILLANCE; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105808
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a globally distributed zoonotic disease with significant economic impacts. Control measures in Great Britain include testing for and culling diseased animals. Farmers receive compensation for the value of culled animals, but not for the consequential costs of having to comply with testing and associated control measures. Such uncompensated costs can be significant. We present results of a survey of 1,600 dairy and beef farm holdings conducted in England and Wales to update and improve estimates of these consequential costs.Estimated costs are positively skewed and show considerable variance, which is in agreement with previous, smaller scale surveys of bTB: most farms experiencing bTB incur modest costs but some suffer significant costs. Testing, movement restrictions and output losses account for over three quarters of total uncompensated costs. Total costs rise with herd size and duration of controls. The composition of consequential costs changes as total costs increase, with an increasing proportion of the costs being associated with output losses and movement restrictions, and a decreasing proportion of costs associated with testing costs. Consequential costs tend to be higher for dairy than beef herds but this is likely due to larger herd sizes for dairy.Overall we find the total farm costs of bTB surpass those compensated for by Government in Great Britain. This study contributes to the publicprivate cost-sharing debate as farmers bear some of the economic burden of a disease breakdown. The methodology and results presented are crucial for informed Government and farmer decision-making. The identification of potential risk factors in this study was challenging but is of relevance outside GB.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[21]   Disease awareness, information retrieval and change in biosecurity routines among pig farmers in association with the first PRRS outbreak in Sweden [J].
Noremark, Maria ;
Lindberg, Ann ;
Vagsholm, Ivar ;
Lewerin, Susanna Sternberg .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2009, 90 (1-2) :1-9
[22]  
Petticrew M, 2006, SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, P1, DOI 10.1002/9780470754887
[23]   Farmers and bovine tuberculosis: Contextualising statutory disease control within everyday farming lives [J].
Robinson, Philip A. .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2017, 55 :168-180
[24]   A Framework for Categorization of the Economic Impacts of Outbreaks of Highly Contagious Livestock Diseases [J].
Saatkamp, H. W. ;
Mourits, M. C. M. ;
Howe, K. S. .
TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2016, 63 (04) :422-434
[25]  
Sheppard A., 2005, EC IMPACT ASSESSMENT
[26]   Determinants of biosecurity behaviour of British cattle and sheep farmers-A behavioural economics analysis [J].
Toma, Luiza ;
Stott, Alistair W. ;
Heffernan, Claire ;
Ringrose, Sian ;
Gunn, George J. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2013, 108 (04) :321-333
[27]  
World Bank, 2010, PEOPL PATH OUR PLANE, V1