Assessing project portfolio risk via an enhanced GA-BPNN combined with PCA

被引:32
作者
Bai, Libiao [1 ]
Song, Chaopeng
Zhou, Xinyu
Tian, Yuanyuan
Wei, Lan
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xian 710064, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Project portfolio risk; Risk assessment; Backpropagation neural network; Improved genetic algorithm; Principal component analysis; GENETIC ALGORITHM; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; INTEGRATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106779
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Assessing project portfolio risk (PPR) is essential for organizations to grasp the overall risk levels of project portfolios (PPs) and realize PPR mitigation. However, current research is inadequate to effectively assess PPR, which brings challenges to managing PPR. In this context, the purpose of this study is to develop a PPR assessment model via an enhanced backpropagation neural network (BPNN). First, PPR assessment criteria considering project interdependencies are determined. Second, fuzzy logic is used to obtain original data for assessment criteria. Principal component analysis (PCA) is then employed to reduce the dimensionality of assessment criteria and derive the input and output of BPNN. Third, an improved genetic algorithm (IGA) is designed to optimize the initial weights and thresholds of BPNN. On this basis, the PCA-IGA-BPNN assessment model is constructed, followed by training and testing, possessing a test accuracy of 98.6%. Finally, comparison experiments are conducted from both internal and external perspectives. For internal comparison, the proposed model yields less mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean square error (MSE), and root mean square error (RMSE) than PCA-GA-BPNN, IGA-BPNN, PCA-BPNN and BPNN and offers the largest convergence speed (). As for external comparison, the presented model produces lower MAPE, MSE, and RMSE than Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and has the largest coefficient of determination (R2). Results indicate that the established model performs more satisfactorily in assessing PPR. This research enriches PPR assessment methods and provides managers with a useful tool to evaluate PPR.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GUID PROJ MAN BOD KN, V3rd
[2]   Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE) [J].
Anowar, Farzana ;
Sadaoui, Samira ;
Selim, Bassant .
COMPUTER SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 40
[3]   Bitcoin price forecasting with neuro-fuzzy techniques [J].
Atsalakis, George S. ;
Atsalaki, Loanna G. ;
Pasiouras, Fotios ;
Zopounidis, Constantin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 276 (02) :770-780
[4]   Measurement of Project Portfolio Benefits With a GA-BP Neural Network Group [J].
Bai, Libiao ;
An, Yuqin ;
Sun, Yichen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 71 :4737-4749
[5]   GA-BP neural network modeling for project portfolio risk prediction [J].
Bai, Libiao ;
Wei, Lan ;
Zhang, Yipei ;
Zheng, Kanyin ;
Zhou, Xinyu .
JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 37 (03) :828-850
[6]   Project portfolio risk analysis with the consideration of project interdependencies [J].
Bai, Libiao ;
Shi, Huijing ;
Kang, Shuyun ;
Zhang, Bingbing .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 30 (02) :647-670
[7]   Service provider portfolio selection for project management using a BP neural network [J].
Bai, Libiao ;
Zheng, Kanyin ;
Wang, Zhiguo ;
Liu, Jiale .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2022, 308 (1-2) :41-62
[8]   Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success [J].
Beringer, Claus ;
Jonas, Daniel ;
Kock, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (06) :830-846
[9]   Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling: Priority rule performance revisited [J].
Browning, Tyson R. ;
Yassine, Ali A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 126 (02) :212-228
[10]   Prioritization of project proposals in portfolio management using fuzzy AHP [J].
Chatterjee K. ;
Hossain S.A. ;
Kar S. .
OPSEARCH, 2018, 55 (2) :478-501